Controlled Study on Laparoscopy and Open Surgery Repair for Gastroduodenal Ulcer Perforation

Objective To compare the clinical effect of laparoscopic and open surgery repair in the treatment of gastroduodenal ulcer perforation. Methods The clinical data of 32 cases with gastroduodenal ulcer perforation receiving laparoscopic repair(laparoscopy group) and 39 cases receiving open surgery repair(open surgery group) were retrospectively controlled and analyzed. Results Compared with open surgery group,the laparoscopy group had smaller intraoperative blood loss,less postoperative time of the recovery of intestinal peristalsis,shorter hospitalization time and fewer incidence of complications,but higher hospitalization payment(all P 0.01) . The operation time had no significant difference between two groups(P 0.05) . Conclusions Laparoscopic repair for gastroduodenal ulcer perforation has the advantages of less trauma,faster postoperative recovery,fewer postoperative complications etc.,it can be used as the first choice in most patients with gastroduodenal ulcer perforation.