2012•Sichuan Medical JournalRequires access

A comparative study of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open anterior resection for rectal cancer

Xiao Qi-ha

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To study the safety and invasiveness of hand-assisted laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer.Methods Sixty patients undergoing anterior resection for rectal cancer were randomly divided into HALS group and open group,and all the lesions were located up the peritoneal reflection.Data of patients of two groups,which included operating time,intraoperative blood,lymph node harvests,postoperative flatus time,hospital stay,complications and C-reactive protein were compared.Results The mean intraoperative blood loss,postoperative flatus time,hospital stay and C-reactive protein in HALS group were significantly less than that in open anterior resection for rectal cancer group;bu t there was no significant difference in operating time,complication and recurrence rate.Conclusion HALS is feasible and safe in rectal cancer patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To study the safety and invasiveness of hand-assisted laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer.Methods Sixty patients undergoing anterior resection for rectal cancer were randomly divided into HALS group and open group,and all the lesions were located up the peritoneal reflection.Data of patients of two groups,which included operating time,intraoperative blood,lymph node harvests,postoperative flatus time,hospital stay,complications and C-reactive protein were compared.Results The mean intraoperative blood loss,postoperative flatus time,hospital stay and C-reactive protein in HALS group were significantly less than that in open anterior resection for rectal cancer group;bu t there was no significant difference in operating time,complication and recurrence rate.Conclusion HALS is feasible and safe in rectal cancer patients.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To study the safety and invasiveness of hand-assisted laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer.Methods Sixty patients undergoing anterior resection for rectal cancer were randomly divided into HALS group and open group,and all the lesions were located up the peritoneal reflection.Data of patients of two groups,which included operating time,intraoperative blood,lymph node harvests,postoperative flatus time,hospital stay,complications and C-reactive protein were compared.Results The mean intraoperative blood loss,postoperative flatus time,hospital stay and C-reactive protein in HALS group were significantly less than that in open anterior resection for rectal cancer group;bu t there was no significant difference in operating time,complication and recurrence rate.Conclusion HALS is feasible and safe in rectal cancer patients.

Key concepts: Medicine, Colorectal cancer, Surgery, Blood loss, Lymph node, Resection, Laparoscopy, Cancer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparative study of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open anterior resection for rectal cancer — Research Paper | ScholarLens