2012•Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious DiseasesRequires access

Etiology of hand, foot and mouth disease in Beijing in 2010

Cheng Ju

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the pathogen distribution of patients with hand, foot and mouth diseases (HFMD) hospitalized in division of pediatrics, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, in 2010. Methods Real-time fluorescence quantitative RT-PCR kits with three reagents: universal enterovirus primer, Coxsackievirus A16 (CA16) primer and enterovirus 71 (EV71) primer were used to detect the samples. Results The enterovirus-positive rate was 63.20% (213/337).Among this, the positive rates of enterovirus 71, Coxsackievirus A-16 and other types of enterovirus were 40.36% (136/337), 5.46%(19/337) and 17.21%(58/337), respectively. Conclusions In 2010, the etiology of children with hand, foot and mouth disease hospitalized in our hospital was dominated by enterovirus 71(EV71). The infection rates of enterovirus except enterovirus 71 and Coxsackievirus A16 are main pathogens. Non-CA16, non-EV71 virus infection were significant higher than Coxsackievirus A16 infection.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the pathogen distribution of patients with hand, foot and mouth diseases (HFMD) hospitalized in division of pediatrics, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, in 2010. Methods Real-time fluorescence quantitative RT-PCR kits with three reagents: universal enterovirus primer, Coxsackievirus A16 (CA16) primer and enterovirus 71 (EV71) primer were used to detect the samples. Results The enterovirus-positive rate was 63.20% (213/337).Among this, the positive rates of enterovirus 71, Coxsackievirus A-16 and other types of enterovirus were 40.36% (136/337), 5.46%(19/337) and 17.21%(58/337), respectively. Conclusions In 2010, the etiology of children with hand, foot and mouth disease hospitalized in our hospital was dominated by enterovirus 71(EV71). The infection rates of enterovirus except enterovirus 71 and Coxsackievirus A16 are main pathogens. Non-CA16, non-EV71 virus infection were significant higher than Coxsackievirus A16 infection.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the pathogen distribution of patients with hand, foot and mouth diseases (HFMD) hospitalized in division of pediatrics, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, in 2010. Methods Real-time fluorescence quantitative RT-PCR kits with three reagents: universal enterovirus primer, Coxsackievirus A16 (CA16) primer and enterovirus 71 (EV71) primer were used to detect the samples. Results The enterovirus-positive rate was 63.20% (213/337).Among this, the positive rates of enterovirus 71, Coxsackievirus A-16 and other types of enterovirus were 40.36% (136/337), 5.46%(19/337) and 17.21%(58/337), respectively. Conclusions In 2010, the etiology of children with hand, foot and mouth disease hospitalized in our hospital was dominated by enterovirus 71(EV71). The infection rates of enterovirus except enterovirus 71 and Coxsackievirus A16 are main pathogens. Non-CA16, non-EV71 virus infection were significant higher than Coxsackievirus A16 infection.

Key concepts: Enterovirus 71, Enterovirus, Foot-and-mouth disease, Coxsackievirus, Medicine, Hand-foot-and-mouth disease, Etiology, Virology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Etiology of hand, foot and mouth disease in Beijing in 2010 — Research Paper | ScholarLens