2001SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

The Supreme Court of Canada in the Twenty-First Century

Patrick J. Monahan

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This paper reviews the evolution in the role and functions of the Supreme Court of Canada over the past 25 years, and attempts to identify certain major challenges facing the institution in the decades ahead. In the past 25 years, the Supreme Court has moved from a traditional appellate tribunal to a body exercising a broad supervisory function in the interpretation and the application of Canadian law. Professor Monahan describes the nature of this evolution, and compares certain key aspects of the Court's current caseload and performance with that of the English House of Lords and the U.S. Supreme Court. He also reviews the continuing debate over the legitimacy of judicial review under the Charter and argues that contrary to the claims of certain critics, the Court has been largely successful in striking an appropriate balance between its own role and that of the Legislative and executive branch.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper reviews the evolution in the role and functions of the Supreme Court of Canada over the past 25 years, and attempts to identify certain major challenges facing the institution in the decades ahead. In the past 25 years, the Supreme Court has moved from a traditional appellate tribunal to a body exercising a broad supervisory function in the interpretation and the application of Canadian law. Professor Monahan describes the nature of this evolution, and compares certain key aspects of the Court's current caseload and performance with that of the English House of Lords and the U.S. Supreme Court. He also reviews the continuing debate over the legitimacy of judicial review under the Charter and argues that contrary to the claims of certain critics, the Court has been largely successful in striking an appropriate balance between its own role and that of the Legislative and executive branch.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper reviews the evolution in the role and functions of the Supreme Court of Canada over the past 25 years, and attempts to identify certain major challenges facing the institution in the decades ahead. In the past 25 years, the Supreme Court has moved from a traditional appellate tribunal to a body exercising a broad supervisory function in the interpretation and the application of Canadian law. Professor Monahan describes the nature of this evolution, and compares certain key aspects of the Court's current caseload and performance with that of the English House of Lords and the U.S. Supreme Court. He also reviews the continuing debate over the legitimacy of judicial review under the Charter and argues that contrary to the claims of certain critics, the Court has been largely successful in striking an appropriate balance between its own role and that of the Legislative and executive branch.

Key concepts: Supreme court, Law, Political science, Charter, Legitimacy, Original jurisdiction, Institution, Legislature

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Supreme Court of Canada in the Twenty-First Century — Research Paper | ScholarLens