2002•Journal of Nanjing Normal UniversityRequires access

A Law-economics Approach to Priority to Gain Compensation Owned by the Subrogation Man

Huang He

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The judicial explanation of the Supreme People's Court enlarges the effect of the subrogation right regulated by contract law,which has been arousing questions of civil law circle.The article will use the analytical methods of costbeneficial results in laweconomics to demonstrate that the system in which loaners can exercise the subrogation right and have priority to gain compensation is more efficient and more propitious to realize the equilibrium of equity and efficiency than the one in which loaners cannot exercise the subrogation right or they can exercise the right but have no priority to gain compensation,and that such is the optimal choice in system.So,the judicial design is feasible in practice,and to make the judicial explanation be the legal articles is the need to perfect the system on subrogation right and perform its functions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The judicial explanation of the Supreme People's Court enlarges the effect of the subrogation right regulated by contract law,which has been arousing questions of civil law circle.The article will use the analytical methods of costbeneficial results in laweconomics to demonstrate that the system in which loaners can exercise the subrogation right and have priority to gain compensation is more efficient and more propitious to realize the equilibrium of equity and efficiency than the one in which loaners cannot exercise the subrogation right or they can exercise the right but have no priority to gain compensation,and that such is the optimal choice in system.So,the judicial design is feasible in practice,and to make the judicial explanation be the legal articles is the need to perfect the system on subrogation right and perform its functions.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The judicial explanation of the Supreme People's Court enlarges the effect of the subrogation right regulated by contract law,which has been arousing questions of civil law circle.The article will use the analytical methods of costbeneficial results in laweconomics to demonstrate that the system in which loaners can exercise the subrogation right and have priority to gain compensation is more efficient and more propitious to realize the equilibrium of equity and efficiency than the one in which loaners cannot exercise the subrogation right or they can exercise the right but have no priority to gain compensation,and that such is the optimal choice in system.So,the judicial design is feasible in practice,and to make the judicial explanation be the legal articles is the need to perfect the system on subrogation right and perform its functions.

Key concepts: Subrogation, Compensation (psychology), Equity (law), Supreme court, Law, Law and economics, Economics, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Law-economics Approach to Priority to Gain Compensation Owned by the Subrogation Man — Research Paper | ScholarLens