2013Kunming Yike Daxue xuebaoRequires access

Comparison of the Curative Effect of Bare-handed Cardiopulmonary Rsuscitation and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitator in Rescue of Respiratory and Cardiac Arrest Patients

Liu L

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To assess the clinical siginificance of the cardiopulmonary resuscitator in respiratory and cardiac arrest patients by comparing the curative effect of cardiopulmonary resuscitator and bare-handed cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Methods 102 patients on the verge of the death were randomiy divided into two groups and begin to CPR in four seconds after confirmation of respiratory and cardiac arrest.Patients in group 1 were given bare-handed CPR.Patients in group 2 were given cardiopulmonary resuscitation by cardiopulmonary resuscitator.Patients in both group 1 and group 2 received lasting CPR according to the 2010 GUIDE of CPR,then we observed their self-heart-beating,self-breathing,caroid puise,expression,puplillas,ECG.Results In the group 1,the effective case was 1,the non-effcctive cases were 63,the effective rate was 1.56%.In the group 2,the effective cases were 6,the non-effective cases were 31,the effective rate was 16.21%,there was a statistically significant difference between two groups(P0.01).Conclusion Cardiopulmonary resuscitator has good effect in cardiopulmomary resuscitation for respiratory and cardiac arrest patients,and the effective rate is significantly higher than bare-handed CPR,so it deserves clinical promotion.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To assess the clinical siginificance of the cardiopulmonary resuscitator in respiratory and cardiac arrest patients by comparing the curative effect of cardiopulmonary resuscitator and bare-handed cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Methods 102 patients on the verge of the death were randomiy divided into two groups and begin to CPR in four seconds after confirmation of respiratory and cardiac arrest.Patients in group 1 were given bare-handed CPR.Patients in group 2 were given cardiopulmonary resuscitation by cardiopulmonary resuscitator.Patients in both group 1 and group 2 received lasting CPR according to the 2010 GUIDE of CPR,then we observed their self-heart-beating,self-breathing,caroid puise,expression,puplillas,ECG.Results In the group 1,the effective case was 1,the non-effcctive cases were 63,the effective rate was 1.56%.In the group 2,the effective cases were 6,the non-effective cases were 31,the effective rate was 16.21%,there was a statistically significant difference between two groups(P0.01).Conclusion Cardiopulmonary resuscitator has good effect in cardiopulmomary resuscitation for respiratory and cardiac arrest patients,and the effective rate is significantly higher than bare-handed CPR,so it deserves clinical promotion.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To assess the clinical siginificance of the cardiopulmonary resuscitator in respiratory and cardiac arrest patients by comparing the curative effect of cardiopulmonary resuscitator and bare-handed cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Methods 102 patients on the verge of the death were randomiy divided into two groups and begin to CPR in four seconds after confirmation of respiratory and cardiac arrest.Patients in group 1 were given bare-handed CPR.Patients in group 2 were given cardiopulmonary resuscitation by cardiopulmonary resuscitator.Patients in both group 1 and group 2 received lasting CPR according to the 2010 GUIDE of CPR,then we observed their self-heart-beating,self-breathing,caroid puise,expression,puplillas,ECG.Results In the group 1,the effective case was 1,the non-effcctive cases were 63,the effective rate was 1.56%.In the group 2,the effective cases were 6,the non-effective cases were 31,the effective rate was 16.21%,there was a statistically significant difference between two groups(P0.01).Conclusion Cardiopulmonary resuscitator has good effect in cardiopulmomary resuscitation for respiratory and cardiac arrest patients,and the effective rate is significantly higher than bare-handed CPR,so it deserves clinical promotion.

Key concepts: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Medicine, Cardiopulmonary bypass, Ventilation (architecture), Anesthesia, Respiratory system, Cardiology, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of the Curative Effect of Bare-handed Cardiopulmonary Rsuscitation and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitator in Rescue of Respiratory and Cardiac Arrest Patients — Research Paper | ScholarLens