Judicial Work is the Optimum Means to Protection for Human Rights
Wang Xia-hao
Abstract
Wang Xia-hao
Abstract
The reasons why judicial work is the optimum means to protection for human rights are twofold. The conflict and violation of rights entails the protection for human rights. That the conflict and violation of rights take place is a matter of fact, rather than norm. Jurisdiction is merely the power of judgment. Thus judicial work is the optimum means to protection for human rights. On the other hand, it depends upon the feature of judicial work, that is, judicial independence and neutrality, due process of law, and qualified judiciary, which all judges have graduated with a degree in law from the college and experienced legal professional training.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The reasons why judicial work is the optimum means to protection for human rights are twofold. The conflict and violation of rights entails the protection for human rights. That the conflict and violation of rights take place is a matter of fact, rather than norm. Jurisdiction is merely the power of judgment. Thus judicial work is the optimum means to protection for human rights. On the other hand, it depends upon the feature of judicial work, that is, judicial independence and neutrality, due process of law, and qualified judiciary, which all judges have graduated with a degree in law from the college and experienced legal professional training.
Key concepts: Law, Judicial independence, Human rights, Political science, Jurisdiction, Work (physics), Neutrality, Norm (philosophy)