2006•Chinese Journal of Aesthetic MedicineRequires access

A comparative study of distalizing upper molar by Greenfield Molar Distalization and traditional molar distalization appliance

Yan Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical effect of Greenfield Molar Distaliza tion(GMD) appliance and traditional molar distalization appliance. Methods 48 patients with Class II malocclusion were treated with GMD appliance, Pendulum appliance and extraoral arch by maxillary molars distalization without extraction. Then the effects were evaluated through pre- and post-distalization cephalometric radiographs and the dental models analysis. Results GMD appliance, Pendulum appliance and extraoral arch all can move the maxillary molar successfully. The moving mode of the maxillary molar distalization by GMD appliance is nearly translation. Conclusion the GMD appliance is an effected intraoral patient-independence appliance for the maxillary molar distalization.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical effect of Greenfield Molar Distaliza tion(GMD) appliance and traditional molar distalization appliance. Methods 48 patients with Class II malocclusion were treated with GMD appliance, Pendulum appliance and extraoral arch by maxillary molars distalization without extraction. Then the effects were evaluated through pre- and post-distalization cephalometric radiographs and the dental models analysis. Results GMD appliance, Pendulum appliance and extraoral arch all can move the maxillary molar successfully. The moving mode of the maxillary molar distalization by GMD appliance is nearly translation. Conclusion the GMD appliance is an effected intraoral patient-independence appliance for the maxillary molar distalization.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical effect of Greenfield Molar Distaliza tion(GMD) appliance and traditional molar distalization appliance. Methods 48 patients with Class II malocclusion were treated with GMD appliance, Pendulum appliance and extraoral arch by maxillary molars distalization without extraction. Then the effects were evaluated through pre- and post-distalization cephalometric radiographs and the dental models analysis. Results GMD appliance, Pendulum appliance and extraoral arch all can move the maxillary molar successfully. The moving mode of the maxillary molar distalization by GMD appliance is nearly translation. Conclusion the GMD appliance is an effected intraoral patient-independence appliance for the maxillary molar distalization.

Key concepts: Molar, Maxillary molar, Orthodontics, Dentistry, Malocclusion, Medicine, Mandibular second molar

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparative study of distalizing upper molar by Greenfield Molar Distalization and traditional molar distalization appliance — Research Paper | ScholarLens