A Comparative Research of Presumption of Innocence and the Argument of Appeal to Ignorance
Wang Jian-fang
Abstract
Wang Jian-fang
Abstract
The argument form of innocence presumption is same as that of appeal to ignorance,but they are essentially different.Their differences are mainly as follows: 1) the burden of proof is shifted in the argument of appeal to ignorance,but not in presumption of innocence;2) the assertor and judger who are both same in the argument of appeal to ignorance,but not in presumption of innocence.Based on these differences,this paper argues that presumption of innocence is essentially different from the argument of appeal to ignorance.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The argument form of innocence presumption is same as that of appeal to ignorance,but they are essentially different.Their differences are mainly as follows: 1) the burden of proof is shifted in the argument of appeal to ignorance,but not in presumption of innocence;2) the assertor and judger who are both same in the argument of appeal to ignorance,but not in presumption of innocence.Based on these differences,this paper argues that presumption of innocence is essentially different from the argument of appeal to ignorance.
Key concepts: Appeal, Ignorance, Presumption of innocence, Argument (complex analysis), Innocence, Presumption, Philosophy, Law