2013•Unpublished venueRequires access

Comparative study of clinical effect of fentanyl and sufentanil for the painless colonoscopy

Dajun Liu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective Comparison of fentanyl and sufentanil in painless colonoscopy clinical patients in anesthesia effect comparative analysis. Methods Hospital in January 2011 to December 2011, 100 patients were divided into A, B two group, two group patients were using propofol and fentanyl anesthesia and propofol combined with sufentanil anesthesia method treatment. Results Two groups of a total of 100 patients underwent endoscopy, test results in two groups of patients with average physical parameters had no significant difference (P0.05 ), but was found after according to the patient's oral and overall response can be seen using propofol combined with sufentanil anesthesia anesthesia effect is better than using propofol and fentanyl anesthesia. In two groups of patients with microscopic examination after awakening time of B group was shorter than that of group A, but between the two groups P 0.05, the difference was not statistically significant. Microscopic examination of the number of patients with pain in 2 cases of B group, 7 cases in A group, A group was significantly higher than those of group B (P 0.05 ). Willing to accept the two microscopic examination of the patients of 36 cases in group A, 45 cases in group B, P 0.05 the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion Two kinds of anesthesia methods on patients are able to achieve the anesthetic effect, and can greatly reduce the suffering of patients, but the effects of sufentanil on anesthesia of patients with good effect to fentanyl, worthy of clinical application.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective Comparison of fentanyl and sufentanil in painless colonoscopy clinical patients in anesthesia effect comparative analysis. Methods Hospital in January 2011 to December 2011, 100 patients were divided into A, B two group, two group patients were using propofol and fentanyl anesthesia and propofol combined with sufentanil anesthesia method treatment. Results Two groups of a total of 100 patients underwent endoscopy, test results in two groups of patients with average physical parameters had no significant difference (P0.05 ), but was found after according to the patient's oral and overall response can be seen using propofol combined with sufentanil anesthesia anesthesia effect is better than using propofol and fentanyl anesthesia. In two groups of patients with microscopic examination after awakening time of B group was shorter than that of group A, but between the two groups P 0.05, the difference was not statistically significant. Microscopic examination of the number of patients with pain in 2 cases of B group, 7 cases in A group, A group was significantly higher than those of group B (P 0.05 ). Willing to accept the two microscopic examination of the patients of 36 cases in group A, 45 cases in group B, P 0.05 the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion Two kinds of anesthesia methods on patients are able to achieve the anesthetic effect, and can greatly reduce the suffering of patients, but the effects of sufentanil on anesthesia of patients with good effect to fentanyl, worthy of clinical application.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective Comparison of fentanyl and sufentanil in painless colonoscopy clinical patients in anesthesia effect comparative analysis. Methods Hospital in January 2011 to December 2011, 100 patients were divided into A, B two group, two group patients were using propofol and fentanyl anesthesia and propofol combined with sufentanil anesthesia method treatment. Results Two groups of a total of 100 patients underwent endoscopy, test results in two groups of patients with average physical parameters had no significant difference (P0.05 ), but was found after according to the patient's oral and overall response can be seen using propofol combined with sufentanil anesthesia anesthesia effect is better than using propofol and fentanyl anesthesia. In two groups of patients with microscopic examination after awakening time of B group was shorter than that of group A, but between the two groups P 0.05, the difference was not statistically significant. Microscopic examination of the number of patients with pain in 2 cases of B group, 7 cases in A group, A group was significantly higher than those of group B (P 0.05 ). Willing to accept the two microscopic examination of the patients of 36 cases in group A, 45 cases in group B, P 0.05 the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion Two kinds of anesthesia methods on patients are able to achieve the anesthetic effect, and can greatly reduce the suffering of patients, but the effects of sufentanil on anesthesia of patients with good effect to fentanyl, worthy of clinical application.

Key concepts: Medicine, Sufentanil, Fentanyl, Propofol, Anesthesia, Anesthetic, Colonoscopy, Group B

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative study of clinical effect of fentanyl and sufentanil for the painless colonoscopy — Research Paper | ScholarLens