2005Modern Medicine HealthRequires access

The comparative study on the results of serum enzymes between Hitachi 7170A and COBAS Integra 400 plus

Xianzhang Huang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To study the comparability on the results of serum enzymes between Hitachi 7170A and COBAS Integra 400 plus.Methods:With the Hitachi7170A biochemical analyzers,Roche reagent and program,Roche c-fas calibration as a target system,COBAS Integra 400 plus as comment system.The AST?LDH?CK?CK-MB were analysed in 41?32?32?30 patient fresh sera respectively and 2 levels of Roche controls.It was judgement whether the results on different analysis systems were comparability according to the half of CLIA,88 with calculation the system bias between target system and comment system.Results:Analysis of variance showed the results of patient sera enzymes had no significant difference between two detection system,and also the correlation coefficient was all above 0.975.The system errors on the all results between Hitachi 7170A and COBAS Integra 400 plus were clinical acceptable.Conclusion:The results of AST?LDH?CK?CK-MB between two analysis systems were comparable,and able to satisfy clinical need.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To study the comparability on the results of serum enzymes between Hitachi 7170A and COBAS Integra 400 plus.Methods:With the Hitachi7170A biochemical analyzers,Roche reagent and program,Roche c-fas calibration as a target system,COBAS Integra 400 plus as comment system.The AST?LDH?CK?CK-MB were analysed in 41?32?32?30 patient fresh sera respectively and 2 levels of Roche controls.It was judgement whether the results on different analysis systems were comparability according to the half of CLIA,88 with calculation the system bias between target system and comment system.Results:Analysis of variance showed the results of patient sera enzymes had no significant difference between two detection system,and also the correlation coefficient was all above 0.975.The system errors on the all results between Hitachi 7170A and COBAS Integra 400 plus were clinical acceptable.Conclusion:The results of AST?LDH?CK?CK-MB between two analysis systems were comparable,and able to satisfy clinical need.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To study the comparability on the results of serum enzymes between Hitachi 7170A and COBAS Integra 400 plus.Methods:With the Hitachi7170A biochemical analyzers,Roche reagent and program,Roche c-fas calibration as a target system,COBAS Integra 400 plus as comment system.The AST?LDH?CK?CK-MB were analysed in 41?32?32?30 patient fresh sera respectively and 2 levels of Roche controls.It was judgement whether the results on different analysis systems were comparability according to the half of CLIA,88 with calculation the system bias between target system and comment system.Results:Analysis of variance showed the results of patient sera enzymes had no significant difference between two detection system,and also the correlation coefficient was all above 0.975.The system errors on the all results between Hitachi 7170A and COBAS Integra 400 plus were clinical acceptable.Conclusion:The results of AST?LDH?CK?CK-MB between two analysis systems were comparable,and able to satisfy clinical need.

Key concepts: Medicine, Roche Diagnostics, Comparability, Significant difference, Chromatography, Nuclear medicine, Internal medicine, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The comparative study on the results of serum enzymes between Hitachi 7170A and COBAS Integra 400 plus — Research Paper | ScholarLens