2001Zhongguo xunzheng yixue zazhiRequires access

A randomized controlled trial of sparfloxacin intravenously. vs ofloxacin intravenously. in the treatment of the acute respiratory infections

Huimin Zhang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of sparfloxacin in treatment of the acute respiratory tract infections. Methods A randomized-controlled clinical trial was carried out .Sparfloxacin 200mg once daily and ofloxacin, as a contral drug, 200mg twice a day, both drugs were given by infusion for 7-14 days .There were 30 ca.ses in each group. Results The clinical cure rates and the clinical efficacy rates of the two groups were 33.33% , 26.67% ,and 80.00% , 76.67% respetively. The bacterial clearance rates were 89.66% and 89.29 % respectively. The adverse drug reaction rates were 13.33% and 16.67% respectively. There were no statistical differences between the two groups (P 0.05) . Photosensitive reaction was not observed in this study. Conclusion Sparfloxacin was effective in the treatment of the respiratory infections.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of sparfloxacin in treatment of the acute respiratory tract infections. Methods A randomized-controlled clinical trial was carried out .Sparfloxacin 200mg once daily and ofloxacin, as a contral drug, 200mg twice a day, both drugs were given by infusion for 7-14 days .There were 30 ca.ses in each group. Results The clinical cure rates and the clinical efficacy rates of the two groups were 33.33% , 26.67% ,and 80.00% , 76.67% respetively. The bacterial clearance rates were 89.66% and 89.29 % respectively. The adverse drug reaction rates were 13.33% and 16.67% respectively. There were no statistical differences between the two groups (P 0.05) . Photosensitive reaction was not observed in this study. Conclusion Sparfloxacin was effective in the treatment of the respiratory infections.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of sparfloxacin in treatment of the acute respiratory tract infections. Methods A randomized-controlled clinical trial was carried out .Sparfloxacin 200mg once daily and ofloxacin, as a contral drug, 200mg twice a day, both drugs were given by infusion for 7-14 days .There were 30 ca.ses in each group. Results The clinical cure rates and the clinical efficacy rates of the two groups were 33.33% , 26.67% ,and 80.00% , 76.67% respetively. The bacterial clearance rates were 89.66% and 89.29 % respectively. The adverse drug reaction rates were 13.33% and 16.67% respectively. There were no statistical differences between the two groups (P 0.05) . Photosensitive reaction was not observed in this study. Conclusion Sparfloxacin was effective in the treatment of the respiratory infections.

Key concepts: Sparfloxacin, Ofloxacin, Medicine, Adverse effect, Randomized controlled trial, Respiratory tract infections, Clinical trial, Respiratory system

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A randomized controlled trial of sparfloxacin intravenously. vs ofloxacin intravenously. in the treatment of the acute respiratory infections — Research Paper | ScholarLens