2014Shiyong yixue zazhiRequires access

The value of microsphere embolism in primary hepatocellular carcinoma with TACE

Cai Heng-y

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the value of microsphere embolism in hepatocellular carcinoma with TACE. Methods A prospective controlled study was performed. One hundred and eighty patients were divided into the microsphere embolism embolization group, the lipiodol embolization group and the united embolization group.Comparations of the TTP, the interphase of treatment before TTP and the survival curves were performed among the three groups. Differences of the liver function, the WBC number, changes of vascular morphology and complications before and 1 month after treatment were analyzed. Results No statistic differences in the TTP, the survival curves,the liver function, the WBC number, changes of vascular morphology and complications were found among the three group(P 0.05). No significant difference in the interphase of treatment before TTP was found between the embolism embolization group and the lipiodol embolization group(P 0.05). Significant difference of the interphase of treatment was found between the lipiodol embolization group and the embolism embolization group or the united embolization group(P 0.05). Conclusion The microspheres embolism with TACE is safe, which can extend the interphase of treatment before TTP, but can not extend the TTP and survival curves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the value of microsphere embolism in hepatocellular carcinoma with TACE. Methods A prospective controlled study was performed. One hundred and eighty patients were divided into the microsphere embolism embolization group, the lipiodol embolization group and the united embolization group.Comparations of the TTP, the interphase of treatment before TTP and the survival curves were performed among the three groups. Differences of the liver function, the WBC number, changes of vascular morphology and complications before and 1 month after treatment were analyzed. Results No statistic differences in the TTP, the survival curves,the liver function, the WBC number, changes of vascular morphology and complications were found among the three group(P 0.05). No significant difference in the interphase of treatment before TTP was found between the embolism embolization group and the lipiodol embolization group(P 0.05). Significant difference of the interphase of treatment was found between the lipiodol embolization group and the embolism embolization group or the united embolization group(P 0.05). Conclusion The microspheres embolism with TACE is safe, which can extend the interphase of treatment before TTP, but can not extend the TTP and survival curves.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the value of microsphere embolism in hepatocellular carcinoma with TACE. Methods A prospective controlled study was performed. One hundred and eighty patients were divided into the microsphere embolism embolization group, the lipiodol embolization group and the united embolization group.Comparations of the TTP, the interphase of treatment before TTP and the survival curves were performed among the three groups. Differences of the liver function, the WBC number, changes of vascular morphology and complications before and 1 month after treatment were analyzed. Results No statistic differences in the TTP, the survival curves,the liver function, the WBC number, changes of vascular morphology and complications were found among the three group(P 0.05). No significant difference in the interphase of treatment before TTP was found between the embolism embolization group and the lipiodol embolization group(P 0.05). Significant difference of the interphase of treatment was found between the lipiodol embolization group and the embolism embolization group or the united embolization group(P 0.05). Conclusion The microspheres embolism with TACE is safe, which can extend the interphase of treatment before TTP, but can not extend the TTP and survival curves.

Key concepts: Lipiodol, Embolization, Medicine, Embolism, Hepatocellular carcinoma, Interphase, Radiology, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The value of microsphere embolism in primary hepatocellular carcinoma with TACE — Research Paper | ScholarLens