Compared study the clinical efficacy of PKRP and TURP in the treatment of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and complications of transurethral resection of the prostate(TURP) and plasmakinetic energy transurethral resection of the prostate(PKRP) in the treatment of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH).Methods A total of 768 patients with BPH were enrolled from June 2003 to June 2008.The age,International Prostate Symptoms Scales(IPSS),residual urine volume(RUV),the maximum of urine quotiety(Qmax),Quality of Life(QOL),operational time,blood loss of operation,catheterization time,days in hospital and the complications of operation were reviewed and analysed.Result There is no significant differences between the datas of two groups before operation(P0.05).Compared with the TURP group,the PKRP group has the same operation success rates,hospital stay andcatheterization time and blood loss of operation(P0.05),but has the lower rate of complications and longer operational time(P0.05).Conclusion Both surgical procedures have significant efficacy in the treatment of patients with BPH.The surgical modalities can be chosen based on individual conditions the prostate so as to obtain better clinical results.