2009Clinical Education of General PracticeRequires access

Predicting the response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy by ER and/or PR status in patients with locally advanced breast cancer

Jia Huang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate whether the expressions of ER and/or PR could predict the sensitivity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancers.Methods All 144 patients with breast cancers received neoadjuvant chemotherapy.The ER and PR expressions of tumors were determined preoperatively by immuno-histochemistry.The relationship of ER/PR status with response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was then evaluated.Results Response rates of ER(-)and ER(+)tumors to neoadjuvant chemotherapy were 83.91% and 57.89%;PR(-)and PR(+)were 80.85% and 60.00% respectively.The significant differences were observed between ER(-)vs ER(+)(χ2=12.00,P0.05)and PR(-)vs PR(+)(χ2=7.30,P0.05).The response rate in tumors with ER and PR absent tumors was significantly higher than that in ER and/or PR positive(χ2=9.53,P0.05).Conclusion ER and/or PR negative breast cancers were more sensitive to neoadjuvant chemotherapy,which indicated ER and PR might be predictive markers of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate whether the expressions of ER and/or PR could predict the sensitivity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancers.Methods All 144 patients with breast cancers received neoadjuvant chemotherapy.The ER and PR expressions of tumors were determined preoperatively by immuno-histochemistry.The relationship of ER/PR status with response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was then evaluated.Results Response rates of ER(-)and ER(+)tumors to neoadjuvant chemotherapy were 83.91% and 57.89%;PR(-)and PR(+)were 80.85% and 60.00% respectively.The significant differences were observed between ER(-)vs ER(+)(χ2=12.00,P0.05)and PR(-)vs PR(+)(χ2=7.30,P0.05).The response rate in tumors with ER and PR absent tumors was significantly higher than that in ER and/or PR positive(χ2=9.53,P0.05).Conclusion ER and/or PR negative breast cancers were more sensitive to neoadjuvant chemotherapy,which indicated ER and PR might be predictive markers of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate whether the expressions of ER and/or PR could predict the sensitivity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancers.Methods All 144 patients with breast cancers received neoadjuvant chemotherapy.The ER and PR expressions of tumors were determined preoperatively by immuno-histochemistry.The relationship of ER/PR status with response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was then evaluated.Results Response rates of ER(-)and ER(+)tumors to neoadjuvant chemotherapy were 83.91% and 57.89%;PR(-)and PR(+)were 80.85% and 60.00% respectively.The significant differences were observed between ER(-)vs ER(+)(χ2=12.00,P0.05)and PR(-)vs PR(+)(χ2=7.30,P0.05).The response rate in tumors with ER and PR absent tumors was significantly higher than that in ER and/or PR positive(χ2=9.53,P0.05).Conclusion ER and/or PR negative breast cancers were more sensitive to neoadjuvant chemotherapy,which indicated ER and PR might be predictive markers of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Key concepts: Medicine, Chemotherapy, Breast cancer, Oncology, Internal medicine, Neoadjuvant therapy, Complete response, Cancer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Predicting the response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy by ER and/or PR status in patients with locally advanced breast cancer — Research Paper | ScholarLens