2003•PubMedRequires access

[Influence of bone remodeling in extraction sites on tooth movement].

Xiao Ni Yuan, Huiju Cao, Songjiao Luo

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of bone remodeling in extraction sites and orthodontic forces on tooth movement with the aim of providing a basis for selecting optimal orthodontic forces, time of tooth movement and reducing the time for tooth moving into extraction sites. METHODS: Extraction of upper first molars were performed on 36 male Sprague-Dawley rats which were divided equally into 3 groups. A method for quantification of orthodontic tooth movement in the rats was presented. Orthodontic appliance was placed at different time after tooth extraction. Different forces were used to move the maxillary second molars mesially into the extraction spaces. X-ray was taken before appliance activation and after 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 14 days since appliance activation. Tooth movement was measured cephalometrically by Imagine Analysis Technique, adjusting for magnification by using the known digitized length of the broach. RESULTS: 1. The tooth on the recent extraction side moved faster than that on the healed side. 2. Tooth movement at all time points on the 0.30 N curve differed from those on the higher force curves (P < 0.01), either moving into recent extraction sites or healing sites. Comparison between 0.60 N and 1.36 N indicated that mesial molar movement did not differ from each other after day 5. 3. The classical tooth movement curve had three parts that represent distinctly different processes: early movement; delay; later movement. CONCLUSION: 1. The tooth on the recent extraction side moved faster than that on the healed side. 2. Moderate force maybe was the optimal orthodontic force. It could be overloaded, but resulted in no further enhancement of tooth movement.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of bone remodeling in extraction sites and orthodontic forces on tooth movement with the aim of providing a basis for selecting optimal orthodontic forces, time of tooth movement and reducing the time for tooth moving into extraction sites. METHODS: Extraction of upper first molars were performed on 36 male Sprague-Dawley rats which were divided equally into 3 groups. A method for quantification of orthodontic tooth movement in the rats was presented. Orthodontic appliance was placed at different time after tooth extraction. Different forces were used to move the maxillary second molars mesially into the extraction spaces. X-ray was taken before appliance activation and after 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 14 days since appliance activation. Tooth movement was measured cephalometrically by Imagine Analysis Technique, adjusting for magnification by using the known digitized length of the broach. RESULTS: 1. The tooth on the recent extraction side moved faster than that on the healed side. 2. Tooth movement at all time points on the 0.30 N curve differed from those on the higher force curves (P < 0.01), either moving into recent extraction sites or healing sites. Comparison between 0.60 N and 1.36 N indicated that mesial molar movement did not differ from each other after day 5. 3. The classical tooth movement curve had three parts that represent distinctly different processes: early movement; delay; later movement. CONCLUSION: 1. The tooth on the recent extraction side moved faster than that on the healed side. 2. Moderate force maybe was the optimal orthodontic force. It could be overloaded, but resulted in no further enhancement of tooth movement.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of bone remodeling in extraction sites and orthodontic forces on tooth movement with the aim of providing a basis for selecting optimal orthodontic forces, time of tooth movement and reducing the time for tooth moving into extraction sites. METHODS: Extraction of upper first molars were performed on 36 male Sprague-Dawley rats which were divided equally into 3 groups. A method for quantification of orthodontic tooth movement in the rats was presented. Orthodontic appliance was placed at different time after tooth extraction. Different forces were used to move the maxillary second molars mesially into the extraction spaces. X-ray was taken before appliance activation and after 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 14 days since appliance activation. Tooth movement was measured cephalometrically by Imagine Analysis Technique, adjusting for magnification by using the known digitized length of the broach. RESULTS: 1. The tooth on the recent extraction side moved faster than that on the healed side. 2. Tooth movement at all time points on the 0.30 N curve differed from those on the higher force curves (P < 0.01), either moving into recent extraction sites or healing sites. Comparison between 0.60 N and 1.36 N indicated that mesial molar movement did not differ from each other after day 5. 3. The classical tooth movement curve had three parts that represent distinctly different processes: early movement; delay; later movement. CONCLUSION: 1. The tooth on the recent extraction side moved faster than that on the healed side. 2. Moderate force maybe was the optimal orthodontic force. It could be overloaded, but resulted in no further enhancement of tooth movement.

Key concepts: Molar, Extraction (chemistry), Dentistry, Movement (music), Orthodontics, Mandibular first molar, Magnification, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Influence of bone remodeling in extraction sites on tooth movement]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens