2014BMJ Case ReportsOpen access

Alternatives for restoration of a hemisected mandibular molar

YG Naveen, Jayanti R. Patel, Pooja Parikh, Khyati Shah

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

Hemisection is a common conservative treatment option for periodontally or endodontically compromised teeth. It is most likely to be performed on mandibular molars with class II or III furcation involvement. Their restoration is more critical than implant surgery to ensure the ability to masticate along with the ability to maintain good oral hygiene. There are various alternatives to restore such types of teeth: the remaining root restored as an individual tooth, restoring individual roots with either a molar or premolar morphology using the adjacent tooth as an abutment in a full coverage fixed partial denture, restoring individual roots with either molar or premolar morphology using an inlay type of restoration on the adjacent abutment tooth. This article reports two cases, one treated with molar morphology and an inlay type of restoration and the other with a premolar morphology and a full coverage fixed partial denture.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Hemisection is a common conservative treatment option for periodontally or endodontically compromised teeth. It is most likely to be performed on mandibular molars with class II or III furcation involvement. Their restoration is more critical than implant surgery to ensure the ability to masticate along with the ability to maintain good oral hygiene. There are various alternatives to restore such types of teeth: the remaining root restored as an individual tooth, restoring individual roots with either a molar or premolar morphology using the adjacent tooth as an abutment in a full coverage fixed partial denture, restoring individual roots with either molar or premolar morphology using an inlay type of restoration on the adjacent abutment tooth. This article reports two cases, one treated with molar morphology and an inlay type of restoration and the other with a premolar morphology and a full coverage fixed partial denture.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Hemisection is a common conservative treatment option for periodontally or endodontically compromised teeth. It is most likely to be performed on mandibular molars with class II or III furcation involvement. Their restoration is more critical than implant surgery to ensure the ability to masticate along with the ability to maintain good oral hygiene. There are various alternatives to restore such types of teeth: the remaining root restored as an individual tooth, restoring individual roots with either a molar or premolar morphology using the adjacent tooth as an abutment in a full coverage fixed partial denture, restoring individual roots with either molar or premolar morphology using an inlay type of restoration on the adjacent abutment tooth. This article reports two cases, one treated with molar morphology and an inlay type of restoration and the other with a premolar morphology and a full coverage fixed partial denture.

Key concepts: Molar, Inlay, Dentistry, Medicine, Premolar, Orthodontics, Abutment, Mandibular molar

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Alternatives for restoration of a hemisected mandibular molar — Research Paper | ScholarLens