2015•Huaxi yixueRequires access

Clinical Efficacy Comparison between Rosuvastatin and Atorvastatin on Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Premature Coronary Heart Disease

Fan Zhi-b

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To observe and analyze the short-term efficacy of different statins on acute myocardial infarction in patients with premature coronary heart disease. Methods We selected 70 patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted into our hospital for treatment of premature coronary artery disease between January 2012 and June 2013. The patients were randomly divided into experimental group(n=35) and control group(n=35). The experimental group were treated with rosuvastatin, and the control group of patients were given atorvastatin. We observed the rate of overall efficiency within 6 months after treatment, and total cholesterol(TC), triglyceride(TG), low density lipoprotein cholesterol(LDL-C), high density lipoprotein cholesterol(HDL-C), hepersensitive C-reactive protein(hs-CRP), left ventricular ejction fraction(LVEF), and flow-mediated dilation(FMD) were also observed before and after treatment. Results The overall efficacy rate in the experimental group at 6 months was 94.3% and in the control group was 88.6% with no significant difference between each other(P 0.05). TG and FMD of patients in the experimental group at 6 months did not significantly change(P 0.05), while LVEF of the experimental group was significantly higher(P 0.05), and hs-CRP, TC, LDL-C, and HDL-C of the experimental group were significantly lower than the control group(P 0.05). Conclusion Short-term comprehensive efficacy of rosuvastatin for treatment of premature coronary artery disease in patients with acute myocardial infarction is superior to atorvastatin.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To observe and analyze the short-term efficacy of different statins on acute myocardial infarction in patients with premature coronary heart disease. Methods We selected 70 patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted into our hospital for treatment of premature coronary artery disease between January 2012 and June 2013. The patients were randomly divided into experimental group(n=35) and control group(n=35). The experimental group were treated with rosuvastatin, and the control group of patients were given atorvastatin. We observed the rate of overall efficiency within 6 months after treatment, and total cholesterol(TC), triglyceride(TG), low density lipoprotein cholesterol(LDL-C), high density lipoprotein cholesterol(HDL-C), hepersensitive C-reactive protein(hs-CRP), left ventricular ejction fraction(LVEF), and flow-mediated dilation(FMD) were also observed before and after treatment. Results The overall efficacy rate in the experimental group at 6 months was 94.3% and in the control group was 88.6% with no significant difference between each other(P 0.05). TG and FMD of patients in the experimental group at 6 months did not significantly change(P 0.05), while LVEF of the experimental group was significantly higher(P 0.05), and hs-CRP, TC, LDL-C, and HDL-C of the experimental group were significantly lower than the control group(P 0.05). Conclusion Short-term comprehensive efficacy of rosuvastatin for treatment of premature coronary artery disease in patients with acute myocardial infarction is superior to atorvastatin.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To observe and analyze the short-term efficacy of different statins on acute myocardial infarction in patients with premature coronary heart disease. Methods We selected 70 patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted into our hospital for treatment of premature coronary artery disease between January 2012 and June 2013. The patients were randomly divided into experimental group(n=35) and control group(n=35). The experimental group were treated with rosuvastatin, and the control group of patients were given atorvastatin. We observed the rate of overall efficiency within 6 months after treatment, and total cholesterol(TC), triglyceride(TG), low density lipoprotein cholesterol(LDL-C), high density lipoprotein cholesterol(HDL-C), hepersensitive C-reactive protein(hs-CRP), left ventricular ejction fraction(LVEF), and flow-mediated dilation(FMD) were also observed before and after treatment. Results The overall efficacy rate in the experimental group at 6 months was 94.3% and in the control group was 88.6% with no significant difference between each other(P 0.05). TG and FMD of patients in the experimental group at 6 months did not significantly change(P 0.05), while LVEF of the experimental group was significantly higher(P 0.05), and hs-CRP, TC, LDL-C, and HDL-C of the experimental group were significantly lower than the control group(P 0.05). Conclusion Short-term comprehensive efficacy of rosuvastatin for treatment of premature coronary artery disease in patients with acute myocardial infarction is superior to atorvastatin.

Key concepts: Medicine, Internal medicine, Myocardial infarction, Rosuvastatin, Atorvastatin, Cardiology, Ejection fraction, Coronary artery disease

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical Efficacy Comparison between Rosuvastatin and Atorvastatin on Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Premature Coronary Heart Disease — Research Paper | ScholarLens