The Compare of Civil and Foreign Agreement Jurisdiction System
Yanling Li
Abstract
Yanling Li
Abstract
Comparing the national agreement jurisdiction systems is to explore the rule of reforming the agreement jurisdiction system under the conditions of market economy to consummate the agreement jurisdiction system of our country.This paper intro- duced characteristics of the United States,France and Germany,analyzed some problems such as the range of the civil agreement juris- diction in our country,indicated clearly the choice of having jurisdiction and silently showed the choice of having jurisdiction,etc.and tried to harmonize conflict between the authority of court and the parties' disposition from the theoretical point.The purpose to point out the suggestions is to meet China's judicial practice.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Comparing the national agreement jurisdiction systems is to explore the rule of reforming the agreement jurisdiction system under the conditions of market economy to consummate the agreement jurisdiction system of our country.This paper intro- duced characteristics of the United States,France and Germany,analyzed some problems such as the range of the civil agreement juris- diction in our country,indicated clearly the choice of having jurisdiction and silently showed the choice of having jurisdiction,etc.and tried to harmonize conflict between the authority of court and the parties' disposition from the theoretical point.The purpose to point out the suggestions is to meet China's judicial practice.
Key concepts: Jurisdiction, Agreement, Law, Criminal jurisdiction, Political science, China, Original jurisdiction, Subject-matter jurisdiction