2013Journal of Lanzhou UniversityRequires access

Effect and security of dexmedetomidine in ventilated patients sedation

Le Zhang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To explore the sedative effects and security of dexmedetomidine on ventilated patients vs midazolam or propofol.Methods 56 ventilated patients were divided into dexmedetomidine group(group A),midazolam group(group B),propofol group(group C).Recorded the sequential organ failure assessment,ramsay score and partial pressure of oxygen/oxygen concentration index indicators before sedation.Heart rate,blood pressure and respiration were recorded at 4,8 and 12 h of sedation.The infusion was ceased after 12 h,then the sedative degree was assessed every 60 min,and recovery time,time to achieve satisfactory sedation and the sedation level were recorded.Results Dexmedetomidine could achieve a good sedative effect,and had no suppression for respiration.After infusion,the recovery time was good.But it had cardiovascular adverse effects(P 0.05).Conclusion Dexmedetomidine has peculiar advances for ventilated patients,so its use should be generalized with watching security.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To explore the sedative effects and security of dexmedetomidine on ventilated patients vs midazolam or propofol.Methods 56 ventilated patients were divided into dexmedetomidine group(group A),midazolam group(group B),propofol group(group C).Recorded the sequential organ failure assessment,ramsay score and partial pressure of oxygen/oxygen concentration index indicators before sedation.Heart rate,blood pressure and respiration were recorded at 4,8 and 12 h of sedation.The infusion was ceased after 12 h,then the sedative degree was assessed every 60 min,and recovery time,time to achieve satisfactory sedation and the sedation level were recorded.Results Dexmedetomidine could achieve a good sedative effect,and had no suppression for respiration.After infusion,the recovery time was good.But it had cardiovascular adverse effects(P 0.05).Conclusion Dexmedetomidine has peculiar advances for ventilated patients,so its use should be generalized with watching security.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To explore the sedative effects and security of dexmedetomidine on ventilated patients vs midazolam or propofol.Methods 56 ventilated patients were divided into dexmedetomidine group(group A),midazolam group(group B),propofol group(group C).Recorded the sequential organ failure assessment,ramsay score and partial pressure of oxygen/oxygen concentration index indicators before sedation.Heart rate,blood pressure and respiration were recorded at 4,8 and 12 h of sedation.The infusion was ceased after 12 h,then the sedative degree was assessed every 60 min,and recovery time,time to achieve satisfactory sedation and the sedation level were recorded.Results Dexmedetomidine could achieve a good sedative effect,and had no suppression for respiration.After infusion,the recovery time was good.But it had cardiovascular adverse effects(P 0.05).Conclusion Dexmedetomidine has peculiar advances for ventilated patients,so its use should be generalized with watching security.

Key concepts: Dexmedetomidine, Sedation, Midazolam, Sedative, Anesthesia, Propofol, Medicine, Heart rate

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect and security of dexmedetomidine in ventilated patients sedation — Research Paper | ScholarLens