2006•Hebei faxueRequires access

Seven Difficult Problems of Legislation in Real Right Law

JI Xiu-ping

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In our future real right law,there should be some limitations to the open objects,but not the open contents in the property register of immovables;Lawsuit time limit should not be applied to return protoplast right of applicant;We had better constitute positive prescription system;Powerless punish should not affect the force of contracts when the endorser has no right,but the transferee is well-meaning;There should be proper toleration to the unanimous consent principle on punishing mutual thing;We should prohibit mortgaging to some movable property which has no way to open;There should not be the time limitation when mortgager realizes the hypothec after the fulfilling term of primary creditor's rights is over,except that mortgager is not the debtor;When the debtor do not refund the debt,the mortgager cannot get the guaranty directly,but he may put in for the court to auction guaranty.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In our future real right law,there should be some limitations to the open objects,but not the open contents in the property register of immovables;Lawsuit time limit should not be applied to return protoplast right of applicant;We had better constitute positive prescription system;Powerless punish should not affect the force of contracts when the endorser has no right,but the transferee is well-meaning;There should be proper toleration to the unanimous consent principle on punishing mutual thing;We should prohibit mortgaging to some movable property which has no way to open;There should not be the time limitation when mortgager realizes the hypothec after the fulfilling term of primary creditor's rights is over,except that mortgager is not the debtor;When the debtor do not refund the debt,the mortgager cannot get the guaranty directly,but he may put in for the court to auction guaranty.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In our future real right law,there should be some limitations to the open objects,but not the open contents in the property register of immovables;Lawsuit time limit should not be applied to return protoplast right of applicant;We had better constitute positive prescription system;Powerless punish should not affect the force of contracts when the endorser has no right,but the transferee is well-meaning;There should be proper toleration to the unanimous consent principle on punishing mutual thing;We should prohibit mortgaging to some movable property which has no way to open;There should not be the time limitation when mortgager realizes the hypothec after the fulfilling term of primary creditor's rights is over,except that mortgager is not the debtor;When the debtor do not refund the debt,the mortgager cannot get the guaranty directly,but he may put in for the court to auction guaranty.

Key concepts: Lawsuit, Debtor, Creditor, Law, Surety, Meaning (existential), Unjust enrichment, Legislation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Seven Difficult Problems of Legislation in Real Right Law — Research Paper | ScholarLens