On Responsibilities Arising from Coexistence of Guaranty and Hypothecation
Feng Pan
Abstract
Feng Pan
Abstract
When guaranty and hypothecation coexist, there still exist some problems with theory and judicial practice. As to the problem with the division of responsibility between the guarantor and the pledger, the resolution is not theoretically based on the principle that the real right takes precedence over the creditors right, instead, the creditor has the right to require the guarantor and pledger to undertake their responsibility according to the agreed share and the related legal regulations. As for the problem with the internal recovery, the resolution should be based on the principle of fairness. Specifically speaking, when the actual amount of guaranty exceeds the guarantors share calculated on a basis of proportion, the guarantor will have the right to recover the part above his share from the other party. As to the problem with the relief or exemption of guarantors liability, the guarantor can be relieved or exempted from his liability of guaranty within the scope where the creditor renounce his right or within the scope where the creditor is remiss to exercise his real right and causes the depreciation, derogation and loss of the pledge.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
When guaranty and hypothecation coexist, there still exist some problems with theory and judicial practice. As to the problem with the division of responsibility between the guarantor and the pledger, the resolution is not theoretically based on the principle that the real right takes precedence over the creditors right, instead, the creditor has the right to require the guarantor and pledger to undertake their responsibility according to the agreed share and the related legal regulations. As for the problem with the internal recovery, the resolution should be based on the principle of fairness. Specifically speaking, when the actual amount of guaranty exceeds the guarantors share calculated on a basis of proportion, the guarantor will have the right to recover the part above his share from the other party. As to the problem with the relief or exemption of guarantors liability, the guarantor can be relieved or exempted from his liability of guaranty within the scope where the creditor renounce his right or within the scope where the creditor is remiss to exercise his real right and causes the depreciation, derogation and loss of the pledge.
Key concepts: Surety, Pledge, Creditor, Derogation, Depreciation (economics), Liability, Scope (computer science), Business