2003•Journal of Southwest Jiaotong UniversityRequires access

On Responsibilities Arising from Coexistence of Guaranty and Hypothecation

Feng Pan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

When guaranty and hypothecation coexist, there still exist some problems with theory and judicial practice. As to the problem with the division of responsibility between the guarantor and the pledger, the resolution is not theoretically based on the principle that the real right takes precedence over the creditors right, instead, the creditor has the right to require the guarantor and pledger to undertake their responsibility according to the agreed share and the related legal regulations. As for the problem with the internal recovery, the resolution should be based on the principle of fairness. Specifically speaking, when the actual amount of guaranty exceeds the guarantors share calculated on a basis of proportion, the guarantor will have the right to recover the part above his share from the other party. As to the problem with the relief or exemption of guarantors liability, the guarantor can be relieved or exempted from his liability of guaranty within the scope where the creditor renounce his right or within the scope where the creditor is remiss to exercise his real right and causes the depreciation, derogation and loss of the pledge.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

When guaranty and hypothecation coexist, there still exist some problems with theory and judicial practice. As to the problem with the division of responsibility between the guarantor and the pledger, the resolution is not theoretically based on the principle that the real right takes precedence over the creditors right, instead, the creditor has the right to require the guarantor and pledger to undertake their responsibility according to the agreed share and the related legal regulations. As for the problem with the internal recovery, the resolution should be based on the principle of fairness. Specifically speaking, when the actual amount of guaranty exceeds the guarantors share calculated on a basis of proportion, the guarantor will have the right to recover the part above his share from the other party. As to the problem with the relief or exemption of guarantors liability, the guarantor can be relieved or exempted from his liability of guaranty within the scope where the creditor renounce his right or within the scope where the creditor is remiss to exercise his real right and causes the depreciation, derogation and loss of the pledge.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

When guaranty and hypothecation coexist, there still exist some problems with theory and judicial practice. As to the problem with the division of responsibility between the guarantor and the pledger, the resolution is not theoretically based on the principle that the real right takes precedence over the creditors right, instead, the creditor has the right to require the guarantor and pledger to undertake their responsibility according to the agreed share and the related legal regulations. As for the problem with the internal recovery, the resolution should be based on the principle of fairness. Specifically speaking, when the actual amount of guaranty exceeds the guarantors share calculated on a basis of proportion, the guarantor will have the right to recover the part above his share from the other party. As to the problem with the relief or exemption of guarantors liability, the guarantor can be relieved or exempted from his liability of guaranty within the scope where the creditor renounce his right or within the scope where the creditor is remiss to exercise his real right and causes the depreciation, derogation and loss of the pledge.

Key concepts: Surety, Pledge, Creditor, Derogation, Depreciation (economics), Liability, Scope (computer science), Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On Responsibilities Arising from Coexistence of Guaranty and Hypothecation — Research Paper | ScholarLens