2007Beijing Medical JournalRequires access

Clinical evaluation of methods for detection of Treponema pallidum infection

Jie Zhang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the application value of four methods for detecting Treponema pallidum infection. Methods Three methods were used to test the serum of 602 cases. Sixty one of these cases were diagnosed as syphilis. The three methods were enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), Treponema pallidum particle assay (TPPA) and rapid plasma regain test(RPR). 134 positive samples detected by RPR were re-examined by Fluorescence quantitative PCR(FQ-PCR) method. Results There was no obvious difference between ELISA and TPPA test results(P﹥0.05). The sensibility detected by ELISA and TPPA were 95.1% and 97.8%, while the specificity was 91.8% and 96.9%. There was significant difference between RPR and ELISA or TPPA (P﹤0.05). But those cases detected by FQ-PCR were negative. Conclusions Both ELISA and TPPA methods are good methods for determination of Treponema pallidum infection. The positive rate of FQ-PCR is low in the detection of Treponema pallidum.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the application value of four methods for detecting Treponema pallidum infection. Methods Three methods were used to test the serum of 602 cases. Sixty one of these cases were diagnosed as syphilis. The three methods were enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), Treponema pallidum particle assay (TPPA) and rapid plasma regain test(RPR). 134 positive samples detected by RPR were re-examined by Fluorescence quantitative PCR(FQ-PCR) method. Results There was no obvious difference between ELISA and TPPA test results(P﹥0.05). The sensibility detected by ELISA and TPPA were 95.1% and 97.8%, while the specificity was 91.8% and 96.9%. There was significant difference between RPR and ELISA or TPPA (P﹤0.05). But those cases detected by FQ-PCR were negative. Conclusions Both ELISA and TPPA methods are good methods for determination of Treponema pallidum infection. The positive rate of FQ-PCR is low in the detection of Treponema pallidum.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the application value of four methods for detecting Treponema pallidum infection. Methods Three methods were used to test the serum of 602 cases. Sixty one of these cases were diagnosed as syphilis. The three methods were enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), Treponema pallidum particle assay (TPPA) and rapid plasma regain test(RPR). 134 positive samples detected by RPR were re-examined by Fluorescence quantitative PCR(FQ-PCR) method. Results There was no obvious difference between ELISA and TPPA test results(P﹥0.05). The sensibility detected by ELISA and TPPA were 95.1% and 97.8%, while the specificity was 91.8% and 96.9%. There was significant difference between RPR and ELISA or TPPA (P﹤0.05). But those cases detected by FQ-PCR were negative. Conclusions Both ELISA and TPPA methods are good methods for determination of Treponema pallidum infection. The positive rate of FQ-PCR is low in the detection of Treponema pallidum.

Key concepts: Treponema, Syphilis, Medicine, Significant difference, Virology, Internal medicine, Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical evaluation of methods for detection of Treponema pallidum infection — Research Paper | ScholarLens