2008Zhongguo xin yao zazhiRequires access

Clinical evaluation for the therapeutic effect of intravenous metoprolol in patients with rapid atrial fibrillation

Zhang Long-you

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To evaluate the therapeutic effect on atrial fibrillation of intravenous metoprolol and its safety.Methods:Patients with atrial fibrillation(n=68) were randomly divided into 2 groups.They were treated with intravenous injection of either metoprolol(5~15mg,n=34) or cedilanid(0.4~0.8mg,n=34,as the control).The heart rate and blood pressure were respectively observed before the injection,and 20min,40min,60min and 120min after the injection.Results:The occurrence that heart rate decreased to less than 100bpm within 120min in metoprolol group(55.88%,19/34) did not significantly differ from that in cedilanid group(38.23%,13/34,P0.05).The average time to decreased heart rate to less than 100bpm in metoprolol group [(18.33±12.31) min] was significantly shorter than that in cedilanid group [(65.00±35.05) min,P0.01].The average effective time in metoprolol group [(14.00±9.95) min] was significantly shorter than that in cedilanid group [(62.50±41.66) min,P0.01)].The total effective rate in metoprolol group(85.29%) was higher than that in cedilanid group(58.82%,P0.01).Conclusion:Intravenous metoprolol is effective and safe in the treatment of rapid atrial fibrillation;therefore it provides another credible way for treating rapid atrial fibrillation in emergency department.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To evaluate the therapeutic effect on atrial fibrillation of intravenous metoprolol and its safety.Methods:Patients with atrial fibrillation(n=68) were randomly divided into 2 groups.They were treated with intravenous injection of either metoprolol(5~15mg,n=34) or cedilanid(0.4~0.8mg,n=34,as the control).The heart rate and blood pressure were respectively observed before the injection,and 20min,40min,60min and 120min after the injection.Results:The occurrence that heart rate decreased to less than 100bpm within 120min in metoprolol group(55.88%,19/34) did not significantly differ from that in cedilanid group(38.23%,13/34,P0.05).The average time to decreased heart rate to less than 100bpm in metoprolol group [(18.33±12.31) min] was significantly shorter than that in cedilanid group [(65.00±35.05) min,P0.01].The average effective time in metoprolol group [(14.00±9.95) min] was significantly shorter than that in cedilanid group [(62.50±41.66) min,P0.01)].The total effective rate in metoprolol group(85.29%) was higher than that in cedilanid group(58.82%,P0.01).Conclusion:Intravenous metoprolol is effective and safe in the treatment of rapid atrial fibrillation;therefore it provides another credible way for treating rapid atrial fibrillation in emergency department.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To evaluate the therapeutic effect on atrial fibrillation of intravenous metoprolol and its safety.Methods:Patients with atrial fibrillation(n=68) were randomly divided into 2 groups.They were treated with intravenous injection of either metoprolol(5~15mg,n=34) or cedilanid(0.4~0.8mg,n=34,as the control).The heart rate and blood pressure were respectively observed before the injection,and 20min,40min,60min and 120min after the injection.Results:The occurrence that heart rate decreased to less than 100bpm within 120min in metoprolol group(55.88%,19/34) did not significantly differ from that in cedilanid group(38.23%,13/34,P0.05).The average time to decreased heart rate to less than 100bpm in metoprolol group [(18.33±12.31) min] was significantly shorter than that in cedilanid group [(65.00±35.05) min,P0.01].The average effective time in metoprolol group [(14.00±9.95) min] was significantly shorter than that in cedilanid group [(62.50±41.66) min,P0.01)].The total effective rate in metoprolol group(85.29%) was higher than that in cedilanid group(58.82%,P0.01).Conclusion:Intravenous metoprolol is effective and safe in the treatment of rapid atrial fibrillation;therefore it provides another credible way for treating rapid atrial fibrillation in emergency department.

Key concepts: Metoprolol, Atrial fibrillation, Medicine, Heart rate, Ventricular rate, Anesthesia, Cardiology, Therapeutic effect

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical evaluation for the therapeutic effect of intravenous metoprolol in patients with rapid atrial fibrillation — Research Paper | ScholarLens