Clinical evaluation for the therapeutic effect of intravenous metoprolol in patients with rapid atrial fibrillation
Zhang Long-you
Abstract
Zhang Long-you
Abstract
Objective:To evaluate the therapeutic effect on atrial fibrillation of intravenous metoprolol and its safety.Methods:Patients with atrial fibrillation(n=68) were randomly divided into 2 groups.They were treated with intravenous injection of either metoprolol(5~15mg,n=34) or cedilanid(0.4~0.8mg,n=34,as the control).The heart rate and blood pressure were respectively observed before the injection,and 20min,40min,60min and 120min after the injection.Results:The occurrence that heart rate decreased to less than 100bpm within 120min in metoprolol group(55.88%,19/34) did not significantly differ from that in cedilanid group(38.23%,13/34,P0.05).The average time to decreased heart rate to less than 100bpm in metoprolol group [(18.33±12.31) min] was significantly shorter than that in cedilanid group [(65.00±35.05) min,P0.01].The average effective time in metoprolol group [(14.00±9.95) min] was significantly shorter than that in cedilanid group [(62.50±41.66) min,P0.01)].The total effective rate in metoprolol group(85.29%) was higher than that in cedilanid group(58.82%,P0.01).Conclusion:Intravenous metoprolol is effective and safe in the treatment of rapid atrial fibrillation;therefore it provides another credible way for treating rapid atrial fibrillation in emergency department.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective:To evaluate the therapeutic effect on atrial fibrillation of intravenous metoprolol and its safety.Methods:Patients with atrial fibrillation(n=68) were randomly divided into 2 groups.They were treated with intravenous injection of either metoprolol(5~15mg,n=34) or cedilanid(0.4~0.8mg,n=34,as the control).The heart rate and blood pressure were respectively observed before the injection,and 20min,40min,60min and 120min after the injection.Results:The occurrence that heart rate decreased to less than 100bpm within 120min in metoprolol group(55.88%,19/34) did not significantly differ from that in cedilanid group(38.23%,13/34,P0.05).The average time to decreased heart rate to less than 100bpm in metoprolol group [(18.33±12.31) min] was significantly shorter than that in cedilanid group [(65.00±35.05) min,P0.01].The average effective time in metoprolol group [(14.00±9.95) min] was significantly shorter than that in cedilanid group [(62.50±41.66) min,P0.01)].The total effective rate in metoprolol group(85.29%) was higher than that in cedilanid group(58.82%,P0.01).Conclusion:Intravenous metoprolol is effective and safe in the treatment of rapid atrial fibrillation;therefore it provides another credible way for treating rapid atrial fibrillation in emergency department.
Key concepts: Metoprolol, Atrial fibrillation, Medicine, Heart rate, Ventricular rate, Anesthesia, Cardiology, Therapeutic effect