2008•Journal of Sichuan University of Science & EngineeringRequires access

On the Border of the Exceptional Remedy Procedure——And on Amendments of the Reasons for the Retrial of Civil Procedure Law

Jing Wang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Res judicata has both positive and negative values.The positive value excludes the retrial,while the negative value is the logical premise of the retrial.The positive and negative values of res judicata should be defined and determined clearly to define the reasonable border of the res judicata function.The retrial procedure is different from the common remedy procedure.Except that the object of the remedy is the acted judgment(or determined judgment),the principles of the retrial procedure are more important.Refining the reasons for the retrial by the retrial process stresses more the importance of the procedure.However,we should consider the principle of a country the ruled by law – if there are no essential errors of the reasons for the retrial,retrial can not be re-instituted.It is more rational that the reasons for the retrial develop toward the direction.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Res judicata has both positive and negative values.The positive value excludes the retrial,while the negative value is the logical premise of the retrial.The positive and negative values of res judicata should be defined and determined clearly to define the reasonable border of the res judicata function.The retrial procedure is different from the common remedy procedure.Except that the object of the remedy is the acted judgment(or determined judgment),the principles of the retrial procedure are more important.Refining the reasons for the retrial by the retrial process stresses more the importance of the procedure.However,we should consider the principle of a country the ruled by law – if there are no essential errors of the reasons for the retrial,retrial can not be re-instituted.It is more rational that the reasons for the retrial develop toward the direction.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Res judicata has both positive and negative values.The positive value excludes the retrial,while the negative value is the logical premise of the retrial.The positive and negative values of res judicata should be defined and determined clearly to define the reasonable border of the res judicata function.The retrial procedure is different from the common remedy procedure.Except that the object of the remedy is the acted judgment(or determined judgment),the principles of the retrial procedure are more important.Refining the reasons for the retrial by the retrial process stresses more the importance of the procedure.However,we should consider the principle of a country the ruled by law – if there are no essential errors of the reasons for the retrial,retrial can not be re-instituted.It is more rational that the reasons for the retrial develop toward the direction.

Key concepts: Res judicata, Premise, Value (mathematics), Law, Civil procedure, Mathematics, Political science, Statistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On the Border of the Exceptional Remedy Procedure——And on Amendments of the Reasons for the Retrial of Civil Procedure Law — Research Paper | ScholarLens