Clinical Effect Observation of Mechanical Ventilation Combined with Ulinastatin in Treatment of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Zeng Bo-lu
Abstract
Zeng Bo-lu
Abstract
Objective: To observe the clinical effect of mechanical ventilation combined with ulinastatin in treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Methods: Date of Sixty patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome were retrospectively analyzed, treatment group(30 cases) were treated using mechanical ventilation combined with ulinastatin; control group(30 cases) were treated using mechanical ventilation, then the respiratory frequency, PaO2, PaO2/FiO2, PCO2, APACHEII scores, chest radiograph change, VAP incidence and mortality in the two groups were observed. Results: Respiratory frequency, PaO2, PaO2/FiO2and PCO2in treatment group were better than those in control group(t=6.39, 6.27, 24.07, 9.82,P0.05); VAP incidence was 20.0% in treatment group, and was less than 36.7% in control group( X2=5.84, P=0.0160.05); mortality(3.3%) in treatment group was less than 16.7% in control group(X2= 5.71, P=0.0170.05). APACHEII scores and chest X-ray changes between the two groups had obvious difference(t=7.14, 6.33, P 0.05). Conclusion: The clinical effect of mechanical ventilation combined with ulinastatin in treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome is good; the treatment can improve lung function, alleviates the symptoms, improves the safety and reliability and controls the mortality.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective: To observe the clinical effect of mechanical ventilation combined with ulinastatin in treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Methods: Date of Sixty patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome were retrospectively analyzed, treatment group(30 cases) were treated using mechanical ventilation combined with ulinastatin; control group(30 cases) were treated using mechanical ventilation, then the respiratory frequency, PaO2, PaO2/FiO2, PCO2, APACHEII scores, chest radiograph change, VAP incidence and mortality in the two groups were observed. Results: Respiratory frequency, PaO2, PaO2/FiO2and PCO2in treatment group were better than those in control group(t=6.39, 6.27, 24.07, 9.82,P0.05); VAP incidence was 20.0% in treatment group, and was less than 36.7% in control group( X2=5.84, P=0.0160.05); mortality(3.3%) in treatment group was less than 16.7% in control group(X2= 5.71, P=0.0170.05). APACHEII scores and chest X-ray changes between the two groups had obvious difference(t=7.14, 6.33, P 0.05). Conclusion: The clinical effect of mechanical ventilation combined with ulinastatin in treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome is good; the treatment can improve lung function, alleviates the symptoms, improves the safety and reliability and controls the mortality.
Key concepts: Ulinastatin, Medicine, Mechanical ventilation, Acute respiratory distress, Chest radiograph, Incidence (geometry), Respiratory distress, Anesthesia