2014Xiandai shengwu yixue jinzhanRequires access

Clinical Effect Observation of Mechanical Ventilation Combined with Ulinastatin in Treatment of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Zeng Bo-lu

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Objective: To observe the clinical effect of mechanical ventilation combined with ulinastatin in treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Methods: Date of Sixty patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome were retrospectively analyzed, treatment group(30 cases) were treated using mechanical ventilation combined with ulinastatin; control group(30 cases) were treated using mechanical ventilation, then the respiratory frequency, PaO2, PaO2/FiO2, PCO2, APACHEII scores, chest radiograph change, VAP incidence and mortality in the two groups were observed. Results: Respiratory frequency, PaO2, PaO2/FiO2and PCO2in treatment group were better than those in control group(t=6.39, 6.27, 24.07, 9.82,P0.05); VAP incidence was 20.0% in treatment group, and was less than 36.7% in control group( X2=5.84, P=0.0160.05); mortality(3.3%) in treatment group was less than 16.7% in control group(X2= 5.71, P=0.0170.05). APACHEII scores and chest X-ray changes between the two groups had obvious difference(t=7.14, 6.33, P 0.05). Conclusion: The clinical effect of mechanical ventilation combined with ulinastatin in treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome is good; the treatment can improve lung function, alleviates the symptoms, improves the safety and reliability and controls the mortality.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To observe the clinical effect of mechanical ventilation combined with ulinastatin in treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Methods: Date of Sixty patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome were retrospectively analyzed, treatment group(30 cases) were treated using mechanical ventilation combined with ulinastatin; control group(30 cases) were treated using mechanical ventilation, then the respiratory frequency, PaO2, PaO2/FiO2, PCO2, APACHEII scores, chest radiograph change, VAP incidence and mortality in the two groups were observed. Results: Respiratory frequency, PaO2, PaO2/FiO2and PCO2in treatment group were better than those in control group(t=6.39, 6.27, 24.07, 9.82,P0.05); VAP incidence was 20.0% in treatment group, and was less than 36.7% in control group( X2=5.84, P=0.0160.05); mortality(3.3%) in treatment group was less than 16.7% in control group(X2= 5.71, P=0.0170.05). APACHEII scores and chest X-ray changes between the two groups had obvious difference(t=7.14, 6.33, P 0.05). Conclusion: The clinical effect of mechanical ventilation combined with ulinastatin in treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome is good; the treatment can improve lung function, alleviates the symptoms, improves the safety and reliability and controls the mortality.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To observe the clinical effect of mechanical ventilation combined with ulinastatin in treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Methods: Date of Sixty patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome were retrospectively analyzed, treatment group(30 cases) were treated using mechanical ventilation combined with ulinastatin; control group(30 cases) were treated using mechanical ventilation, then the respiratory frequency, PaO2, PaO2/FiO2, PCO2, APACHEII scores, chest radiograph change, VAP incidence and mortality in the two groups were observed. Results: Respiratory frequency, PaO2, PaO2/FiO2and PCO2in treatment group were better than those in control group(t=6.39, 6.27, 24.07, 9.82,P0.05); VAP incidence was 20.0% in treatment group, and was less than 36.7% in control group( X2=5.84, P=0.0160.05); mortality(3.3%) in treatment group was less than 16.7% in control group(X2= 5.71, P=0.0170.05). APACHEII scores and chest X-ray changes between the two groups had obvious difference(t=7.14, 6.33, P 0.05). Conclusion: The clinical effect of mechanical ventilation combined with ulinastatin in treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome is good; the treatment can improve lung function, alleviates the symptoms, improves the safety and reliability and controls the mortality.

Key concepts: Ulinastatin, Medicine, Mechanical ventilation, Acute respiratory distress, Chest radiograph, Incidence (geometry), Respiratory distress, Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical Effect Observation of Mechanical Ventilation Combined with Ulinastatin in Treatment of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome — Research Paper | ScholarLens