2006•Collected Papers of History StudiesRequires access

Extended Imbalance:A Comparative Study of US-Japan and US-Korea Alliances after WWII

Wei-Min Wang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Since their coming into being in the Cold War,US-Japan and US-Korea alliances had possessed imbalanced status in American Asia-Pacific alliance strategy.US-Japan alliance had long been the core of American Asia-Pacific strategy,which was of more strategic and political value,whereas US-Korea alliance had been more a military alliance which mainly aimed at coping with direct threats.Accordingly,in the Post-Cold War era,these two alliances have continued to evolve in different ways,US-Japan alliance has been deepening and expanding while US-Korea alliance has proven to be more and more ambivalent.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Since their coming into being in the Cold War,US-Japan and US-Korea alliances had possessed imbalanced status in American Asia-Pacific alliance strategy.US-Japan alliance had long been the core of American Asia-Pacific strategy,which was of more strategic and political value,whereas US-Korea alliance had been more a military alliance which mainly aimed at coping with direct threats.Accordingly,in the Post-Cold War era,these two alliances have continued to evolve in different ways,US-Japan alliance has been deepening and expanding while US-Korea alliance has proven to be more and more ambivalent.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Since their coming into being in the Cold War,US-Japan and US-Korea alliances had possessed imbalanced status in American Asia-Pacific alliance strategy.US-Japan alliance had long been the core of American Asia-Pacific strategy,which was of more strategic and political value,whereas US-Korea alliance had been more a military alliance which mainly aimed at coping with direct threats.Accordingly,in the Post-Cold War era,these two alliances have continued to evolve in different ways,US-Japan alliance has been deepening and expanding while US-Korea alliance has proven to be more and more ambivalent.

Key concepts: Alliance, Cold war, Political science, Ambivalence, Politics, World War II, East Asia, Development economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Extended Imbalance:A Comparative Study of US-Japan and US-Korea Alliances after WWII — Research Paper | ScholarLens