2008•Yixue yanjiusheng xuebaoRequires access

Comparison of the sperm quality analyzer with the conventional manual method in chinese fertility and infertility men

Yu‐Feng Huang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:The accuracy of manual sperm assessment is affected by a variety of factors.Automated systems may be a potential alternative to conduct an accurate semen analysis.The aim of our study was to evaluate the SQA-V device as an automated tool for the assessment of sperm quality.Methods:Semen quality analysis of 15 fresh semen samples of fertility volunteers and 53 samples from infertility patients were detected using SQA V and manual method.Commercially available latex bead controls(two levels of known concentrations) were run in parallel.Both semen and beads were run in duplicate to establish the coefficients of variation(%CV's).The sperm characteristics were compared between SQA V and manual method.Results:There were significant correlations of sperm concentration(rc=0.870,P0.01) between the two methods.Conclusion:Compared with the conventional manual method,SQA V is an more accurate method,simple and easy to use in the management of male infertility.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:The accuracy of manual sperm assessment is affected by a variety of factors.Automated systems may be a potential alternative to conduct an accurate semen analysis.The aim of our study was to evaluate the SQA-V device as an automated tool for the assessment of sperm quality.Methods:Semen quality analysis of 15 fresh semen samples of fertility volunteers and 53 samples from infertility patients were detected using SQA V and manual method.Commercially available latex bead controls(two levels of known concentrations) were run in parallel.Both semen and beads were run in duplicate to establish the coefficients of variation(%CV's).The sperm characteristics were compared between SQA V and manual method.Results:There were significant correlations of sperm concentration(rc=0.870,P0.01) between the two methods.Conclusion:Compared with the conventional manual method,SQA V is an more accurate method,simple and easy to use in the management of male infertility.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:The accuracy of manual sperm assessment is affected by a variety of factors.Automated systems may be a potential alternative to conduct an accurate semen analysis.The aim of our study was to evaluate the SQA-V device as an automated tool for the assessment of sperm quality.Methods:Semen quality analysis of 15 fresh semen samples of fertility volunteers and 53 samples from infertility patients were detected using SQA V and manual method.Commercially available latex bead controls(two levels of known concentrations) were run in parallel.Both semen and beads were run in duplicate to establish the coefficients of variation(%CV's).The sperm characteristics were compared between SQA V and manual method.Results:There were significant correlations of sperm concentration(rc=0.870,P0.01) between the two methods.Conclusion:Compared with the conventional manual method,SQA V is an more accurate method,simple and easy to use in the management of male infertility.

Key concepts: Semen, Sperm, Fertility, Semen analysis, Infertility, Male infertility, Andrology, Semen quality

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of the sperm quality analyzer with the conventional manual method in chinese fertility and infertility men — Research Paper | ScholarLens