2010•Youjiang Medical JournalRequires access

Contrast study of different decompressive craniectomy treatment effects on cerebral infarction after craniocerebral injury

Dong Wenming

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To explore clinical effects of different decompressive craniectomy treatment on severe craniocerebral injury with post-traumatic cerebral infarction.Methods 63 cases of severe craniocerebral injury patients with post-traumatic cerebral infarction were randomly divided into 2 groups,the treatment group(31 cases)and the control group(32 cases).The treatment group received standard traumatic decompressive craniectomy treatment,while the control group received routine craniectomy treatment.Follow-up visits were carried out and Glasgow coma score(GCS)was used to evaluate clinical effects after 6 months.Results The clinical effective percentage of the treatment group was 54.8%,which was considerably higher than that of the control group(15.6%).There was significant difference between two groups(P0.05).The postoperative complications incidence of the treatment group was 22.6%,which was lower than that of the control group(28.1%),but the result of both groups had no statistical significance(P0.05).Conclusion Standard decompressive craniectomy treatment has better clinical effects on severe craniocerebral injury with post-traumatic cerebral infarction,and deserves clinical popularization and application.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To explore clinical effects of different decompressive craniectomy treatment on severe craniocerebral injury with post-traumatic cerebral infarction.Methods 63 cases of severe craniocerebral injury patients with post-traumatic cerebral infarction were randomly divided into 2 groups,the treatment group(31 cases)and the control group(32 cases).The treatment group received standard traumatic decompressive craniectomy treatment,while the control group received routine craniectomy treatment.Follow-up visits were carried out and Glasgow coma score(GCS)was used to evaluate clinical effects after 6 months.Results The clinical effective percentage of the treatment group was 54.8%,which was considerably higher than that of the control group(15.6%).There was significant difference between two groups(P0.05).The postoperative complications incidence of the treatment group was 22.6%,which was lower than that of the control group(28.1%),but the result of both groups had no statistical significance(P0.05).Conclusion Standard decompressive craniectomy treatment has better clinical effects on severe craniocerebral injury with post-traumatic cerebral infarction,and deserves clinical popularization and application.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To explore clinical effects of different decompressive craniectomy treatment on severe craniocerebral injury with post-traumatic cerebral infarction.Methods 63 cases of severe craniocerebral injury patients with post-traumatic cerebral infarction were randomly divided into 2 groups,the treatment group(31 cases)and the control group(32 cases).The treatment group received standard traumatic decompressive craniectomy treatment,while the control group received routine craniectomy treatment.Follow-up visits were carried out and Glasgow coma score(GCS)was used to evaluate clinical effects after 6 months.Results The clinical effective percentage of the treatment group was 54.8%,which was considerably higher than that of the control group(15.6%).There was significant difference between two groups(P0.05).The postoperative complications incidence of the treatment group was 22.6%,which was lower than that of the control group(28.1%),but the result of both groups had no statistical significance(P0.05).Conclusion Standard decompressive craniectomy treatment has better clinical effects on severe craniocerebral injury with post-traumatic cerebral infarction,and deserves clinical popularization and application.

Key concepts: Medicine, Decompressive craniectomy, Glasgow Coma Scale, Traumatic brain injury, Cerebral infarction, Surgery, Craniocerebral trauma, Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Contrast study of different decompressive craniectomy treatment effects on cerebral infarction after craniocerebral injury — Research Paper | ScholarLens