2012•China Medical HeraldRequires access

Clinical research of improved decompressive craniectomy and standard decompressive craniectomy in the treatment of severe craniocerebral injury

Cao Daming

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical effects of improved decompressive craniectomy and standard decompressive craniectomy in the treatment of severe craniocerebral injury,to provide reference for optimizing clinical therapeutic regimen.Methods 224 patients with severe craniocerebral injury treated in our hospital from October 2008 to October 2011 were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group,with 112 patients in each group respectively.The observation group was treated with the improved decompressive craniectomy and the control group was treated with the standard decompressive craniectomy.The operative time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative hospital stay,incidence of operative complications,patients' GCS score and other indicators of the two groups were compared.Results The incidence rate of operative complications was 33.04% in the observation group and 54.46% in the control group,with statistically significant difference between the two groups(χ2 = 8.130,P 0.05).The GCS score were(10.57±1.47) points in the observation group and(8.59±3.20) points in the control group,with statistically significant difference between the two groups(t = 6.659,P 0.05).Conclusion The improved decompressive craniectomy in the treatment of severe craniocerebral injury can effectively improve the prognosis of patients,shorten hospital stay and reduce cost of treatment,thereby worthy of further clinical research and validation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the clinical effects of improved decompressive craniectomy and standard decompressive craniectomy in the treatment of severe craniocerebral injury,to provide reference for optimizing clinical therapeutic regimen.Methods 224 patients with severe craniocerebral injury treated in our hospital from October 2008 to October 2011 were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group,with 112 patients in each group respectively.The observation group was treated with the improved decompressive craniectomy and the control group was treated with the standard decompressive craniectomy.The operative time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative hospital stay,incidence of operative complications,patients' GCS score and other indicators of the two groups were compared.Results The incidence rate of operative complications was 33.04% in the observation group and 54.46% in the control group,with statistically significant difference between the two groups(χ2 = 8.130,P 0.05).The GCS score were(10.57±1.47) points in the observation group and(8.59±3.20) points in the control group,with statistically significant difference between the two groups(t = 6.659,P 0.05).Conclusion The improved decompressive craniectomy in the treatment of severe craniocerebral injury can effectively improve the prognosis of patients,shorten hospital stay and reduce cost of treatment,thereby worthy of further clinical research and validation.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the clinical effects of improved decompressive craniectomy and standard decompressive craniectomy in the treatment of severe craniocerebral injury,to provide reference for optimizing clinical therapeutic regimen.Methods 224 patients with severe craniocerebral injury treated in our hospital from October 2008 to October 2011 were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group,with 112 patients in each group respectively.The observation group was treated with the improved decompressive craniectomy and the control group was treated with the standard decompressive craniectomy.The operative time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative hospital stay,incidence of operative complications,patients' GCS score and other indicators of the two groups were compared.Results The incidence rate of operative complications was 33.04% in the observation group and 54.46% in the control group,with statistically significant difference between the two groups(χ2 = 8.130,P 0.05).The GCS score were(10.57±1.47) points in the observation group and(8.59±3.20) points in the control group,with statistically significant difference between the two groups(t = 6.659,P 0.05).Conclusion The improved decompressive craniectomy in the treatment of severe craniocerebral injury can effectively improve the prognosis of patients,shorten hospital stay and reduce cost of treatment,thereby worthy of further clinical research and validation.

Key concepts: Medicine, Decompressive craniectomy, Surgery, Clinical efficacy, Traumatic brain injury, Incidence (geometry), Therapeutic effect, Regimen

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical research of improved decompressive craniectomy and standard decompressive craniectomy in the treatment of severe craniocerebral injury — Research Paper | ScholarLens