2014Medical Innovation of ChinaRequires access

The Clinical Effect Observation of Tonsillectomy and Adenoidectomy in Treatment of Children with Sleep Apnea

Liu Dong-ju

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To study the clinical effect of tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy in treatment of children with sleep apnea. Method:One hundred and twenty children with hypertrophy of tonsil and adenoid in the hospital from October 2010 to May 2013 were chosen. Sixty cases were given conventional method as tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy and marked as control group. The other 60 cases were given tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy under nasal endoscope and marked as treatment group. Clinical effect,surgical conditions and residual rate of adenoid of both groups were compared after treatment. Result:There was no significant difference of the clinical effects between the two groups (P0.05). Operation time of the control group was (10.1±2.9)min and bleeding amount was (72.0±3.6)mL,while the treatment group was (8.9±2.6)min and (58.0±3.2)mL,which were all obviously better than the control group (P0.05). Residual rate of adenoid of the control group was 36.2%,while treatment group was 14.9%,which was obviously better than the control group (字2=5.98,P0.05). Conclusion:Short-term clinical effects of the two kinds of methods is alike,but tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy under nasal endoscope has advantages like smaller cut,less bleeding amount and lower rate of residual adenoid. It's long-term clinical effect is superior to conventional method and it should be popularized in clinical work.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To study the clinical effect of tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy in treatment of children with sleep apnea. Method:One hundred and twenty children with hypertrophy of tonsil and adenoid in the hospital from October 2010 to May 2013 were chosen. Sixty cases were given conventional method as tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy and marked as control group. The other 60 cases were given tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy under nasal endoscope and marked as treatment group. Clinical effect,surgical conditions and residual rate of adenoid of both groups were compared after treatment. Result:There was no significant difference of the clinical effects between the two groups (P0.05). Operation time of the control group was (10.1±2.9)min and bleeding amount was (72.0±3.6)mL,while the treatment group was (8.9±2.6)min and (58.0±3.2)mL,which were all obviously better than the control group (P0.05). Residual rate of adenoid of the control group was 36.2%,while treatment group was 14.9%,which was obviously better than the control group (字2=5.98,P0.05). Conclusion:Short-term clinical effects of the two kinds of methods is alike,but tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy under nasal endoscope has advantages like smaller cut,less bleeding amount and lower rate of residual adenoid. It's long-term clinical effect is superior to conventional method and it should be popularized in clinical work.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To study the clinical effect of tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy in treatment of children with sleep apnea. Method:One hundred and twenty children with hypertrophy of tonsil and adenoid in the hospital from October 2010 to May 2013 were chosen. Sixty cases were given conventional method as tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy and marked as control group. The other 60 cases were given tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy under nasal endoscope and marked as treatment group. Clinical effect,surgical conditions and residual rate of adenoid of both groups were compared after treatment. Result:There was no significant difference of the clinical effects between the two groups (P0.05). Operation time of the control group was (10.1±2.9)min and bleeding amount was (72.0±3.6)mL,while the treatment group was (8.9±2.6)min and (58.0±3.2)mL,which were all obviously better than the control group (P0.05). Residual rate of adenoid of the control group was 36.2%,while treatment group was 14.9%,which was obviously better than the control group (字2=5.98,P0.05). Conclusion:Short-term clinical effects of the two kinds of methods is alike,but tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy under nasal endoscope has advantages like smaller cut,less bleeding amount and lower rate of residual adenoid. It's long-term clinical effect is superior to conventional method and it should be popularized in clinical work.

Key concepts: Adenoidectomy, Medicine, Tonsillectomy, Adenoid, Tonsil, Adenoid hypertrophy, Sleep apnea, Clinical efficacy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Clinical Effect Observation of Tonsillectomy and Adenoidectomy in Treatment of Children with Sleep Apnea — Research Paper | ScholarLens