Low dose dobutamine stress echocardiography combined with integrated backscatter for identifying survival myocardium in patients with coronary artery disease
Xiaoping Wang
Abstract
Xiaoping Wang
Abstract
Objective To compare the accuracy of low dose dobut amine(Dob) stress echocardiography(LDDSE) and combination of integrated backscatter(IBS) for identifying survival myocardium in patients with coronary artery disease(CAD). Methods Percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) was performed in 18 patients which were admitted for CAD by quantitative coronary artery(QCA). LDDSE was checked and IBS images were obtained before a week of PCI. Two-dimension echocardiography was examined after three months of PCI again. Defining the maximumal changing rate of CVIB(K) during LDDSE 13 as survival myocardium, then the accuracies in identifying survival myocardium were compared between LDDSE and LDDSE+IBS. Results The sensitivity, accuracy for identifying survival myocardium were significantly higher by LDDSE combined with IBS than those of LDDSE [5, 10 μg·kg -1·min -1] ( sensitivity: 91.84% vs 79.6%、 85.7%, P 0.05- 0.01),accuracy: 91.07 vs 78.9%、 85.7% respectively P 0.05- 0.01). Conclusion Identifying survival myocardium by LDDSE combined with IBS was more sensitive, accurate than LDDSE alone.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To compare the accuracy of low dose dobut amine(Dob) stress echocardiography(LDDSE) and combination of integrated backscatter(IBS) for identifying survival myocardium in patients with coronary artery disease(CAD). Methods Percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) was performed in 18 patients which were admitted for CAD by quantitative coronary artery(QCA). LDDSE was checked and IBS images were obtained before a week of PCI. Two-dimension echocardiography was examined after three months of PCI again. Defining the maximumal changing rate of CVIB(K) during LDDSE 13 as survival myocardium, then the accuracies in identifying survival myocardium were compared between LDDSE and LDDSE+IBS. Results The sensitivity, accuracy for identifying survival myocardium were significantly higher by LDDSE combined with IBS than those of LDDSE [5, 10 μg·kg -1·min -1] ( sensitivity: 91.84% vs 79.6%、 85.7%, P 0.05- 0.01),accuracy: 91.07 vs 78.9%、 85.7% respectively P 0.05- 0.01). Conclusion Identifying survival myocardium by LDDSE combined with IBS was more sensitive, accurate than LDDSE alone.
Key concepts: Medicine, Conventional PCI, Cardiology, Internal medicine, Coronary artery disease, Percutaneous coronary intervention, Stress Echocardiography, Dobutamine