2007Shanxi Yike Daxue xuebaoRequires access

A clinical analysis of 107 patients with drug-induced liver disease

Lixin Liu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To improve the early diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced liver disease by summarizing its clinical features. Methods One hundred and seven cases of drug-induced liver disease admitted to our hospital from Jan 2000 to Dec 2006 were reviewed retrospectively. Results A variety of drugs could cause liver disease. The offending agents could be classified as follows:antimicrobial agents(including antituberculotic drugs) (30.84%), traditional Chinese herb medicine (18.69%),antipyretic, analgesic, and anti-inflammatory(7.48%),anticancer drugs (5.61%).And of 107 cases, 57.95% was classified as hepatocellular type, 23.36% as cholestatic type, and 18.69% as mixed type. The main clinical manifestations were fatigue, nausea, vomiting and jaundice. Most of 107 cases (89.72%) had better prognosis. Conclusions A variety of drugs can induce liver disease, and the clinical fatures are of no specificity. To control the drug indication strictly and monitor liver function should be effective measures for prevention.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To improve the early diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced liver disease by summarizing its clinical features. Methods One hundred and seven cases of drug-induced liver disease admitted to our hospital from Jan 2000 to Dec 2006 were reviewed retrospectively. Results A variety of drugs could cause liver disease. The offending agents could be classified as follows:antimicrobial agents(including antituberculotic drugs) (30.84%), traditional Chinese herb medicine (18.69%),antipyretic, analgesic, and anti-inflammatory(7.48%),anticancer drugs (5.61%).And of 107 cases, 57.95% was classified as hepatocellular type, 23.36% as cholestatic type, and 18.69% as mixed type. The main clinical manifestations were fatigue, nausea, vomiting and jaundice. Most of 107 cases (89.72%) had better prognosis. Conclusions A variety of drugs can induce liver disease, and the clinical fatures are of no specificity. To control the drug indication strictly and monitor liver function should be effective measures for prevention.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To improve the early diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced liver disease by summarizing its clinical features. Methods One hundred and seven cases of drug-induced liver disease admitted to our hospital from Jan 2000 to Dec 2006 were reviewed retrospectively. Results A variety of drugs could cause liver disease. The offending agents could be classified as follows:antimicrobial agents(including antituberculotic drugs) (30.84%), traditional Chinese herb medicine (18.69%),antipyretic, analgesic, and anti-inflammatory(7.48%),anticancer drugs (5.61%).And of 107 cases, 57.95% was classified as hepatocellular type, 23.36% as cholestatic type, and 18.69% as mixed type. The main clinical manifestations were fatigue, nausea, vomiting and jaundice. Most of 107 cases (89.72%) had better prognosis. Conclusions A variety of drugs can induce liver disease, and the clinical fatures are of no specificity. To control the drug indication strictly and monitor liver function should be effective measures for prevention.

Key concepts: Medicine, Drug, Vomiting, Jaundice, Nausea, Liver disease, Disease, Antipyretic

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A clinical analysis of 107 patients with drug-induced liver disease — Research Paper | ScholarLens