2005•Jiangxi Cai-Jing Daxue xuebaoRequires access

On Mei ben “Gu Wen Shang Shu” never Written by Mencius

WU Tong-fu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Through investigate since the Song is it is it appear conclusion of scholar of ancient Chinese prose minister late to distinguish to testing this text, think that forms 28 gentle ministers today with the incomplete book of minister that Confucius compiled, Mencius polishes the incomplete book of minister that processes and forms 25 ancient Chinese prose ministers Two formate Kong An Guo handed down copy of minister in Han Dynasty, to the Eastern Jin Dynasty being subtle to dedicate to but spread academic untenable view so far by plum, conclude clearly: (1)25 late books can not be handed down one of Kong An Guo definitely; (2)Mencius can not put in order and process 25 false ancient Chinese proses definitely. And protect the the same conclusion different facts of standard of both sides of the false ancient Chinese prose as the example with the card, is it is it confirm with diction doses of make and language , thought ,etc. standard works become textual criticism limit and value of method , book of times to come to make a self-criticism.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Through investigate since the Song is it is it appear conclusion of scholar of ancient Chinese prose minister late to distinguish to testing this text, think that forms 28 gentle ministers today with the incomplete book of minister that Confucius compiled, Mencius polishes the incomplete book of minister that processes and forms 25 ancient Chinese prose ministers Two formate Kong An Guo handed down copy of minister in Han Dynasty, to the Eastern Jin Dynasty being subtle to dedicate to but spread academic untenable view so far by plum, conclude clearly: (1)25 late books can not be handed down one of Kong An Guo definitely; (2)Mencius can not put in order and process 25 false ancient Chinese proses definitely. And protect the the same conclusion different facts of standard of both sides of the false ancient Chinese prose as the example with the card, is it is it confirm with diction doses of make and language , thought ,etc. standard works become textual criticism limit and value of method , book of times to come to make a self-criticism.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Through investigate since the Song is it is it appear conclusion of scholar of ancient Chinese prose minister late to distinguish to testing this text, think that forms 28 gentle ministers today with the incomplete book of minister that Confucius compiled, Mencius polishes the incomplete book of minister that processes and forms 25 ancient Chinese prose ministers Two formate Kong An Guo handed down copy of minister in Han Dynasty, to the Eastern Jin Dynasty being subtle to dedicate to but spread academic untenable view so far by plum, conclude clearly: (1)25 late books can not be handed down one of Kong An Guo definitely; (2)Mencius can not put in order and process 25 false ancient Chinese proses definitely. And protect the the same conclusion different facts of standard of both sides of the false ancient Chinese prose as the example with the card, is it is it confirm with diction doses of make and language , thought ,etc. standard works become textual criticism limit and value of method , book of times to come to make a self-criticism.

Key concepts: Diction, Criticism, Literature, Order (exchange), Value (mathematics), Philosophy, History, Chinese literature

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On Mei ben “Gu Wen Shang Shu” never Written by Mencius — Research Paper | ScholarLens