2014•China Medicine and PharmacyRequires access

A discussion on the results of Mcnemar's test by SPSS statistics

Sun Fu-shen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the results of Mcnemar's test by hand calculation and SPSS statistics, and to explain reasons for the difference. Methods Application examples of paired design data in related books were selected, and two calculation methods were used: the first was a hand calculation using Mcnemar's test formula, and the second was a calculation by SPSS. Difference of the results done by the two methods were compared. Results The result by hand calculation was P=0.001, while the result by SPSS was P=0.002. The results by the two methods were different. Conclusion SPSS statistics adopts an exact test in the calculation of 2 × 2 contingency tables with paired design data, in which a principle of bionominal distribution is applied. Despite the fact that the result differs from that of hand calculation, neither method will affect the final statistical inference.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the results of Mcnemar's test by hand calculation and SPSS statistics, and to explain reasons for the difference. Methods Application examples of paired design data in related books were selected, and two calculation methods were used: the first was a hand calculation using Mcnemar's test formula, and the second was a calculation by SPSS. Difference of the results done by the two methods were compared. Results The result by hand calculation was P=0.001, while the result by SPSS was P=0.002. The results by the two methods were different. Conclusion SPSS statistics adopts an exact test in the calculation of 2 × 2 contingency tables with paired design data, in which a principle of bionominal distribution is applied. Despite the fact that the result differs from that of hand calculation, neither method will affect the final statistical inference.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the results of Mcnemar's test by hand calculation and SPSS statistics, and to explain reasons for the difference. Methods Application examples of paired design data in related books were selected, and two calculation methods were used: the first was a hand calculation using Mcnemar's test formula, and the second was a calculation by SPSS. Difference of the results done by the two methods were compared. Results The result by hand calculation was P=0.001, while the result by SPSS was P=0.002. The results by the two methods were different. Conclusion SPSS statistics adopts an exact test in the calculation of 2 × 2 contingency tables with paired design data, in which a principle of bionominal distribution is applied. Despite the fact that the result differs from that of hand calculation, neither method will affect the final statistical inference.

Key concepts: McNemar's test, Statistics, Medicine, Contingency table, Test (biology), Chi-square test, Significant difference, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A discussion on the results of Mcnemar's test by SPSS statistics — Research Paper | ScholarLens