2012•Zhongguo yaofangRequires access

Comparision of Efficacy of Rosuvastatin and Simvastatin for Ischemic Stroke

Lin Meng

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical efficacy of rosuvastatin and simvastatin on ischemic stroke. METHODS: 150 hospitalized ischemic stroke patients were selected from our hospital during Sep. 2009-Sep. 2010. 76 patients in rosuvastatin group were given oral dose of rosuvastatin 10 mg, qd; 74 patients in simvastatin group were given oral dose of simvastatin 20 mg, qd. The changes of TC, TG, LDL-C, HDL-C and hs-CRP in fasting venous blood were compared before and after 3 months treatment. RESULTS: Rosuvastatin group and simvastatin group had no significant difference in lipid level and hs-CRP before treatment (all P0.05); TC, TG, LDL-C and hs-CRP were significantly lowered after treatment, HDL-C level was significantly increased after treatment, and rosuvastatin group had greater changes (all P0.05). The ischemic stroke recurrence rates of rosuvastatin group and simvastatin group were 7.89% (6/76) and 18.92% (14/74), respectively. That of rosuvastatin group was significantly lower than that of simvastatin group (P=0.047). The adverse drug reactions of 2 groups were mild relatively, there was no statistical significance (P0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both of rosuvastatin and simvastatin have good lipid-lowering and anti-inflammatory effects on ischemic stroke patients, and the incidence of adverse drug reactions are similar between 2 groups. However, rosuvastatin is more effective with lower recurrence rate.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical efficacy of rosuvastatin and simvastatin on ischemic stroke. METHODS: 150 hospitalized ischemic stroke patients were selected from our hospital during Sep. 2009-Sep. 2010. 76 patients in rosuvastatin group were given oral dose of rosuvastatin 10 mg, qd; 74 patients in simvastatin group were given oral dose of simvastatin 20 mg, qd. The changes of TC, TG, LDL-C, HDL-C and hs-CRP in fasting venous blood were compared before and after 3 months treatment. RESULTS: Rosuvastatin group and simvastatin group had no significant difference in lipid level and hs-CRP before treatment (all P0.05); TC, TG, LDL-C and hs-CRP were significantly lowered after treatment, HDL-C level was significantly increased after treatment, and rosuvastatin group had greater changes (all P0.05). The ischemic stroke recurrence rates of rosuvastatin group and simvastatin group were 7.89% (6/76) and 18.92% (14/74), respectively. That of rosuvastatin group was significantly lower than that of simvastatin group (P=0.047). The adverse drug reactions of 2 groups were mild relatively, there was no statistical significance (P0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both of rosuvastatin and simvastatin have good lipid-lowering and anti-inflammatory effects on ischemic stroke patients, and the incidence of adverse drug reactions are similar between 2 groups. However, rosuvastatin is more effective with lower recurrence rate.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical efficacy of rosuvastatin and simvastatin on ischemic stroke. METHODS: 150 hospitalized ischemic stroke patients were selected from our hospital during Sep. 2009-Sep. 2010. 76 patients in rosuvastatin group were given oral dose of rosuvastatin 10 mg, qd; 74 patients in simvastatin group were given oral dose of simvastatin 20 mg, qd. The changes of TC, TG, LDL-C, HDL-C and hs-CRP in fasting venous blood were compared before and after 3 months treatment. RESULTS: Rosuvastatin group and simvastatin group had no significant difference in lipid level and hs-CRP before treatment (all P0.05); TC, TG, LDL-C and hs-CRP were significantly lowered after treatment, HDL-C level was significantly increased after treatment, and rosuvastatin group had greater changes (all P0.05). The ischemic stroke recurrence rates of rosuvastatin group and simvastatin group were 7.89% (6/76) and 18.92% (14/74), respectively. That of rosuvastatin group was significantly lower than that of simvastatin group (P=0.047). The adverse drug reactions of 2 groups were mild relatively, there was no statistical significance (P0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both of rosuvastatin and simvastatin have good lipid-lowering and anti-inflammatory effects on ischemic stroke patients, and the incidence of adverse drug reactions are similar between 2 groups. However, rosuvastatin is more effective with lower recurrence rate.

Key concepts: Rosuvastatin, Simvastatin, Medicine, Internal medicine, Statin, Stroke (engine), Incidence (geometry), Gastroenterology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparision of Efficacy of Rosuvastatin and Simvastatin for Ischemic Stroke — Research Paper | ScholarLens