Comparision of Efficacy of Rosuvastatin and Simvastatin for Ischemic Stroke
Lin Meng
Abstract
Lin Meng
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical efficacy of rosuvastatin and simvastatin on ischemic stroke. METHODS: 150 hospitalized ischemic stroke patients were selected from our hospital during Sep. 2009-Sep. 2010. 76 patients in rosuvastatin group were given oral dose of rosuvastatin 10 mg, qd; 74 patients in simvastatin group were given oral dose of simvastatin 20 mg, qd. The changes of TC, TG, LDL-C, HDL-C and hs-CRP in fasting venous blood were compared before and after 3 months treatment. RESULTS: Rosuvastatin group and simvastatin group had no significant difference in lipid level and hs-CRP before treatment (all P0.05); TC, TG, LDL-C and hs-CRP were significantly lowered after treatment, HDL-C level was significantly increased after treatment, and rosuvastatin group had greater changes (all P0.05). The ischemic stroke recurrence rates of rosuvastatin group and simvastatin group were 7.89% (6/76) and 18.92% (14/74), respectively. That of rosuvastatin group was significantly lower than that of simvastatin group (P=0.047). The adverse drug reactions of 2 groups were mild relatively, there was no statistical significance (P0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both of rosuvastatin and simvastatin have good lipid-lowering and anti-inflammatory effects on ischemic stroke patients, and the incidence of adverse drug reactions are similar between 2 groups. However, rosuvastatin is more effective with lower recurrence rate.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical efficacy of rosuvastatin and simvastatin on ischemic stroke. METHODS: 150 hospitalized ischemic stroke patients were selected from our hospital during Sep. 2009-Sep. 2010. 76 patients in rosuvastatin group were given oral dose of rosuvastatin 10 mg, qd; 74 patients in simvastatin group were given oral dose of simvastatin 20 mg, qd. The changes of TC, TG, LDL-C, HDL-C and hs-CRP in fasting venous blood were compared before and after 3 months treatment. RESULTS: Rosuvastatin group and simvastatin group had no significant difference in lipid level and hs-CRP before treatment (all P0.05); TC, TG, LDL-C and hs-CRP were significantly lowered after treatment, HDL-C level was significantly increased after treatment, and rosuvastatin group had greater changes (all P0.05). The ischemic stroke recurrence rates of rosuvastatin group and simvastatin group were 7.89% (6/76) and 18.92% (14/74), respectively. That of rosuvastatin group was significantly lower than that of simvastatin group (P=0.047). The adverse drug reactions of 2 groups were mild relatively, there was no statistical significance (P0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both of rosuvastatin and simvastatin have good lipid-lowering and anti-inflammatory effects on ischemic stroke patients, and the incidence of adverse drug reactions are similar between 2 groups. However, rosuvastatin is more effective with lower recurrence rate.
Key concepts: Rosuvastatin, Simvastatin, Medicine, Internal medicine, Statin, Stroke (engine), Incidence (geometry), Gastroenterology