Two Contemporary Theories on Distributive Justice Rawls's Fairness and Nozick's entitlement
Sun Jun-heng
Abstract
Sun Jun-heng
Abstract
This paper analysizes two contemporary theories on distributive justice——Rawls's fairness and Nozick's entitlement, states their contents, purpose,problems,emphasizes Rawls' two principles of justice both unconditional equality and conditional equality,and discusses Nozick's holding justice as basement of distribution and role of the state. In the mean time, they are compared from different perspectives. At last.it briefly points their reference value for modern Chinese distributive justice.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper analysizes two contemporary theories on distributive justice——Rawls's fairness and Nozick's entitlement, states their contents, purpose,problems,emphasizes Rawls' two principles of justice both unconditional equality and conditional equality,and discusses Nozick's holding justice as basement of distribution and role of the state. In the mean time, they are compared from different perspectives. At last.it briefly points their reference value for modern Chinese distributive justice.
Key concepts: Distributive justice, Entitlement (fair division), Distributive property, Economic Justice, Value (mathematics), Sociology, Primary goods, Law and economics