2003Journal of Henan Normal UniversityRequires access

Two Contemporary Theories on Distributive Justice Rawls's Fairness and Nozick's entitlement

Sun Jun-heng

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper analysizes two contemporary theories on distributive justice——Rawls's fairness and Nozick's entitlement, states their contents, purpose,problems,emphasizes Rawls' two principles of justice both unconditional equality and conditional equality,and discusses Nozick's holding justice as basement of distribution and role of the state. In the mean time, they are compared from different perspectives. At last.it briefly points their reference value for modern Chinese distributive justice.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper analysizes two contemporary theories on distributive justice——Rawls's fairness and Nozick's entitlement, states their contents, purpose,problems,emphasizes Rawls' two principles of justice both unconditional equality and conditional equality,and discusses Nozick's holding justice as basement of distribution and role of the state. In the mean time, they are compared from different perspectives. At last.it briefly points their reference value for modern Chinese distributive justice.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper analysizes two contemporary theories on distributive justice——Rawls's fairness and Nozick's entitlement, states their contents, purpose,problems,emphasizes Rawls' two principles of justice both unconditional equality and conditional equality,and discusses Nozick's holding justice as basement of distribution and role of the state. In the mean time, they are compared from different perspectives. At last.it briefly points their reference value for modern Chinese distributive justice.

Key concepts: Distributive justice, Entitlement (fair division), Distributive property, Economic Justice, Value (mathematics), Sociology, Primary goods, Law and economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Two Contemporary Theories on Distributive Justice Rawls's Fairness and Nozick's entitlement — Research Paper | ScholarLens