2013Journal of Clinical Medicine in PracticeRequires access

Comparative analysis of clinical efficacy between open surgeries with minimally percutaneous nephrolithotomy lithotomy(MPCNL) in patients with kidney stones

Deshen Chen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical effect of open surgery and MPCNL in the treatment of kidney stones.Methods Ninety-eight patients with kidney stones were selected,and were divided into observation group and control group,49 cases in each.The observation group received minimally percutaneous nephrolithotomy stone removal surgical treatment and the control group received open surgical treatment.The clinical efficacy of the two groups was compared.Results After surgery,the operating time,blood loss,incision size,stone clearancerate,postoperative hospital stay,ambulation,and flatus time and other indicators of the observation group were markedly better than those of the control group,the difference being statistically significant(P0.05).Conclusion The minimally percutaneous lithotripsy efficacy for patients with kidney stones is superior to open surgery,which is good for early recovery,and it is worthy of wider promotion and application.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the clinical effect of open surgery and MPCNL in the treatment of kidney stones.Methods Ninety-eight patients with kidney stones were selected,and were divided into observation group and control group,49 cases in each.The observation group received minimally percutaneous nephrolithotomy stone removal surgical treatment and the control group received open surgical treatment.The clinical efficacy of the two groups was compared.Results After surgery,the operating time,blood loss,incision size,stone clearancerate,postoperative hospital stay,ambulation,and flatus time and other indicators of the observation group were markedly better than those of the control group,the difference being statistically significant(P0.05).Conclusion The minimally percutaneous lithotripsy efficacy for patients with kidney stones is superior to open surgery,which is good for early recovery,and it is worthy of wider promotion and application.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the clinical effect of open surgery and MPCNL in the treatment of kidney stones.Methods Ninety-eight patients with kidney stones were selected,and were divided into observation group and control group,49 cases in each.The observation group received minimally percutaneous nephrolithotomy stone removal surgical treatment and the control group received open surgical treatment.The clinical efficacy of the two groups was compared.Results After surgery,the operating time,blood loss,incision size,stone clearancerate,postoperative hospital stay,ambulation,and flatus time and other indicators of the observation group were markedly better than those of the control group,the difference being statistically significant(P0.05).Conclusion The minimally percutaneous lithotripsy efficacy for patients with kidney stones is superior to open surgery,which is good for early recovery,and it is worthy of wider promotion and application.

Key concepts: Medicine, Lithotomy position, Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Surgery, Kidney stones, Open surgery, Clinical efficacy, Percutaneous

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative analysis of clinical efficacy between open surgeries with minimally percutaneous nephrolithotomy lithotomy(MPCNL) in patients with kidney stones — Research Paper | ScholarLens