2006Unpublished venueRequires access

Brunet's Federal Arbitration Act

Edward Brunet, Richard E. Speidel, Jean E. Sternlight, Stephen J. Ware

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

(Note: This proposed legislation consists of several recommended changes to federal arbitration legislation) [Insert at start of §2] Scope of Federal Legislation: This legislation applies to transactions or conduct that affects interstate commerce. [Alternative: strike word “involving” before word “commerce” in existing section two of the FAA and substitute word “affecting.”]. [insert as the new last sentence of §2] State Law to Govern Savings Clause: The rule of decision to be applied when deciding the validity of an arbitration agreement should be state law. [insert as new §10(a)(7)] Party Authority to Enhance Review: The parties may contract for judicial review of the arbitration award for reasons beyond the grounds set forth in this act. [insert as new §10(a)(8)] Awards Contrary to Public Policy: Courts may vacate awards that are plainly inconsistent with public policies expressly set out in legislation or legal precedents. [insert as new §18] Preemption. No intent to preempt the field: States may regulate arbitration, provided that state law does not stand as an obstacle to enforcing consensual agreements to arbitrate.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

(Note: This proposed legislation consists of several recommended changes to federal arbitration legislation) [Insert at start of §2] Scope of Federal Legislation: This legislation applies to transactions or conduct that affects interstate commerce. [Alternative: strike word “involving” before word “commerce” in existing section two of the FAA and substitute word “affecting.”]. [insert as the new last sentence of §2] State Law to Govern Savings Clause: The rule of decision to be applied when deciding the validity of an arbitration agreement should be state law. [insert as new §10(a)(7)] Party Authority to Enhance Review: The parties may contract for judicial review of the arbitration award for reasons beyond the grounds set forth in this act. [insert as new §10(a)(8)] Awards Contrary to Public Policy: Courts may vacate awards that are plainly inconsistent with public policies expressly set out in legislation or legal precedents. [insert as new §18] Preemption. No intent to preempt the field: States may regulate arbitration, provided that state law does not stand as an obstacle to enforcing consensual agreements to arbitrate.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

(Note: This proposed legislation consists of several recommended changes to federal arbitration legislation) [Insert at start of §2] Scope of Federal Legislation: This legislation applies to transactions or conduct that affects interstate commerce. [Alternative: strike word “involving” before word “commerce” in existing section two of the FAA and substitute word “affecting.”]. [insert as the new last sentence of §2] State Law to Govern Savings Clause: The rule of decision to be applied when deciding the validity of an arbitration agreement should be state law. [insert as new §10(a)(7)] Party Authority to Enhance Review: The parties may contract for judicial review of the arbitration award for reasons beyond the grounds set forth in this act. [insert as new §10(a)(8)] Awards Contrary to Public Policy: Courts may vacate awards that are plainly inconsistent with public policies expressly set out in legislation or legal precedents. [insert as new §18] Preemption. No intent to preempt the field: States may regulate arbitration, provided that state law does not stand as an obstacle to enforcing consensual agreements to arbitrate.

Key concepts: Arbitration, Federal Arbitration Act, Business, Law and economics, Law, Political science, Compulsory arbitration, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Brunet's Federal Arbitration Act — Research Paper | ScholarLens