2014•China Medicine and PharmacyRequires access

Study on the safety and efficacy of three amino salicylc acid preparations for treating ulcerative colitis

Song Dong-me

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effects of mesalazine, osalazine and sulfasalazine for patientswith ulcerative colitis. Methods 120 patients with ulcerative colitis were randomly divided into mesalazinegroup(n=40), osalazine group(n=39) and sulfasalazine group(n=41). The efficacy and adverse events of the three groups were observed after the treatment of 12 weeks. Results The rate of complete remission and overall effective rate of three groupswere30.0%, 28.2% and 51.2%; 75.0%, 76.9% and 92.7%, respectively. And the differences between mesalazine/osalazine and sulfasalazine were statistically significant(P 0.05). Conclusion Compared with mesalazine and osalazine, sulfasalazine is more effective in treatment of ulcerative colitis, but with a relatively higher incidence of adverse reactions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effects of mesalazine, osalazine and sulfasalazine for patientswith ulcerative colitis. Methods 120 patients with ulcerative colitis were randomly divided into mesalazinegroup(n=40), osalazine group(n=39) and sulfasalazine group(n=41). The efficacy and adverse events of the three groups were observed after the treatment of 12 weeks. Results The rate of complete remission and overall effective rate of three groupswere30.0%, 28.2% and 51.2%; 75.0%, 76.9% and 92.7%, respectively. And the differences between mesalazine/osalazine and sulfasalazine were statistically significant(P 0.05). Conclusion Compared with mesalazine and osalazine, sulfasalazine is more effective in treatment of ulcerative colitis, but with a relatively higher incidence of adverse reactions.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effects of mesalazine, osalazine and sulfasalazine for patientswith ulcerative colitis. Methods 120 patients with ulcerative colitis were randomly divided into mesalazinegroup(n=40), osalazine group(n=39) and sulfasalazine group(n=41). The efficacy and adverse events of the three groups were observed after the treatment of 12 weeks. Results The rate of complete remission and overall effective rate of three groupswere30.0%, 28.2% and 51.2%; 75.0%, 76.9% and 92.7%, respectively. And the differences between mesalazine/osalazine and sulfasalazine were statistically significant(P 0.05). Conclusion Compared with mesalazine and osalazine, sulfasalazine is more effective in treatment of ulcerative colitis, but with a relatively higher incidence of adverse reactions.

Key concepts: Sulfasalazine, Mesalazine, Medicine, Ulcerative colitis, Gastroenterology, Internal medicine, Incidence (geometry), Adverse effect

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Study on the safety and efficacy of three amino salicylc acid preparations for treating ulcerative colitis — Research Paper | ScholarLens