Surgical treatment of high-energy type II/III Pilon fracture
Shengjun Zhang
Abstract
Shengjun Zhang
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the surgery timing and management protocol for high-energy Pilon fracture,and to determine whether long-term results of one of different management protocols for severe tibial Pilon fractures offer advantages over the other.Methods In a retrospective study,46 patients with high-energy type Ⅱ/ Ⅲ Pilon fracture were treated with limited open reduction and external fixation group and open reduction internal fixation with locking compression plate(LCP) +bone grafting group.We evaluated the clinical outcomes according to the rating scale of the modified Mazure score system.Results All patients were followed up at an average of 25.8 months(range 8 to 36 months)after surgery.According to Mazur function assessment system,the curative effect was excellent in 27 patients,good in 10,fair in 36 and poor in 3.The excellent and good rate was 80.4%.The rate in the external fixation group was 70.6%,and 82.8% in the LCP open reduction and internal fixation group.There was no statistically significant difference between the three groups(P0.05).Conclusion Both the two operational methods for the treatment of high-energy type II / III Pilon fracture have good effect.In terms of postoperative soft tissue complications and clinical observation of fracture reconstruction quality,open reduction internal fixation with locking compression plate(LCP) +bone grafting group is superior to the limited open reduction and external fixation group.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To evaluate the surgery timing and management protocol for high-energy Pilon fracture,and to determine whether long-term results of one of different management protocols for severe tibial Pilon fractures offer advantages over the other.Methods In a retrospective study,46 patients with high-energy type Ⅱ/ Ⅲ Pilon fracture were treated with limited open reduction and external fixation group and open reduction internal fixation with locking compression plate(LCP) +bone grafting group.We evaluated the clinical outcomes according to the rating scale of the modified Mazure score system.Results All patients were followed up at an average of 25.8 months(range 8 to 36 months)after surgery.According to Mazur function assessment system,the curative effect was excellent in 27 patients,good in 10,fair in 36 and poor in 3.The excellent and good rate was 80.4%.The rate in the external fixation group was 70.6%,and 82.8% in the LCP open reduction and internal fixation group.There was no statistically significant difference between the three groups(P0.05).Conclusion Both the two operational methods for the treatment of high-energy type II / III Pilon fracture have good effect.In terms of postoperative soft tissue complications and clinical observation of fracture reconstruction quality,open reduction internal fixation with locking compression plate(LCP) +bone grafting group is superior to the limited open reduction and external fixation group.
Key concepts: Medicine, Pilon fracture, Internal fixation, Surgery, Bone grafting, Fixation (population genetics), Rating system, High energy