2011Journal of Huaihai MedicineRequires access

Surgical treatment of high-energy type II/III Pilon fracture

Shengjun Zhang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the surgery timing and management protocol for high-energy Pilon fracture,and to determine whether long-term results of one of different management protocols for severe tibial Pilon fractures offer advantages over the other.Methods In a retrospective study,46 patients with high-energy type Ⅱ/ Ⅲ Pilon fracture were treated with limited open reduction and external fixation group and open reduction internal fixation with locking compression plate(LCP) +bone grafting group.We evaluated the clinical outcomes according to the rating scale of the modified Mazure score system.Results All patients were followed up at an average of 25.8 months(range 8 to 36 months)after surgery.According to Mazur function assessment system,the curative effect was excellent in 27 patients,good in 10,fair in 36 and poor in 3.The excellent and good rate was 80.4%.The rate in the external fixation group was 70.6%,and 82.8% in the LCP open reduction and internal fixation group.There was no statistically significant difference between the three groups(P0.05).Conclusion Both the two operational methods for the treatment of high-energy type II / III Pilon fracture have good effect.In terms of postoperative soft tissue complications and clinical observation of fracture reconstruction quality,open reduction internal fixation with locking compression plate(LCP) +bone grafting group is superior to the limited open reduction and external fixation group.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the surgery timing and management protocol for high-energy Pilon fracture,and to determine whether long-term results of one of different management protocols for severe tibial Pilon fractures offer advantages over the other.Methods In a retrospective study,46 patients with high-energy type Ⅱ/ Ⅲ Pilon fracture were treated with limited open reduction and external fixation group and open reduction internal fixation with locking compression plate(LCP) +bone grafting group.We evaluated the clinical outcomes according to the rating scale of the modified Mazure score system.Results All patients were followed up at an average of 25.8 months(range 8 to 36 months)after surgery.According to Mazur function assessment system,the curative effect was excellent in 27 patients,good in 10,fair in 36 and poor in 3.The excellent and good rate was 80.4%.The rate in the external fixation group was 70.6%,and 82.8% in the LCP open reduction and internal fixation group.There was no statistically significant difference between the three groups(P0.05).Conclusion Both the two operational methods for the treatment of high-energy type II / III Pilon fracture have good effect.In terms of postoperative soft tissue complications and clinical observation of fracture reconstruction quality,open reduction internal fixation with locking compression plate(LCP) +bone grafting group is superior to the limited open reduction and external fixation group.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the surgery timing and management protocol for high-energy Pilon fracture,and to determine whether long-term results of one of different management protocols for severe tibial Pilon fractures offer advantages over the other.Methods In a retrospective study,46 patients with high-energy type Ⅱ/ Ⅲ Pilon fracture were treated with limited open reduction and external fixation group and open reduction internal fixation with locking compression plate(LCP) +bone grafting group.We evaluated the clinical outcomes according to the rating scale of the modified Mazure score system.Results All patients were followed up at an average of 25.8 months(range 8 to 36 months)after surgery.According to Mazur function assessment system,the curative effect was excellent in 27 patients,good in 10,fair in 36 and poor in 3.The excellent and good rate was 80.4%.The rate in the external fixation group was 70.6%,and 82.8% in the LCP open reduction and internal fixation group.There was no statistically significant difference between the three groups(P0.05).Conclusion Both the two operational methods for the treatment of high-energy type II / III Pilon fracture have good effect.In terms of postoperative soft tissue complications and clinical observation of fracture reconstruction quality,open reduction internal fixation with locking compression plate(LCP) +bone grafting group is superior to the limited open reduction and external fixation group.

Key concepts: Medicine, Pilon fracture, Internal fixation, Surgery, Bone grafting, Fixation (population genetics), Rating system, High energy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Surgical treatment of high-energy type II/III Pilon fracture — Research Paper | ScholarLens