2015•Journal of Wuhan Engineering InstituteRequires access

Reflection on SCI Academic Evaluation System

Bai We

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

SCI,a retrieval tool in essence,is generally mistaken for the main or even the only indicator of of the academic journal quality in China,and especially used in the evaluating of value of academic papers blindly.The detriment of Chinese academic will definitely lead to China's academic mess.It is thought by the authors that emphasis should be placed on the combination of the quantitative and qualitative evaluation,that evaluation can't take the place of article review,and that scientific research mechanism should be perfected and journal systems of various institutions can only be regarded as a reference.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

SCI,a retrieval tool in essence,is generally mistaken for the main or even the only indicator of of the academic journal quality in China,and especially used in the evaluating of value of academic papers blindly.The detriment of Chinese academic will definitely lead to China's academic mess.It is thought by the authors that emphasis should be placed on the combination of the quantitative and qualitative evaluation,that evaluation can't take the place of article review,and that scientific research mechanism should be perfected and journal systems of various institutions can only be regarded as a reference.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

SCI,a retrieval tool in essence,is generally mistaken for the main or even the only indicator of of the academic journal quality in China,and especially used in the evaluating of value of academic papers blindly.The detriment of Chinese academic will definitely lead to China's academic mess.It is thought by the authors that emphasis should be placed on the combination of the quantitative and qualitative evaluation,that evaluation can't take the place of article review,and that scientific research mechanism should be perfected and journal systems of various institutions can only be regarded as a reference.

Key concepts: Reflection (computer programming), China, Value (mathematics), Quality (philosophy), Mechanism (biology), Engineering ethics, Mathematics education, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reflection on SCI Academic Evaluation System — Research Paper | ScholarLens