2000Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical RemediesRequires access

Carvedilol vs labetalol in treating mild to moderate essential hypertension in 399 patients

Guo Ji

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of carvedilol and labetalol in treating essential hypertension. METHODS: Three hundred and ninety-nine patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension (M 228, F 171, age; 53 a +- s 9 a) were studied. Two hundred Patients received Carvedilol (n = 100, 10 mg, po, bid) and labetalol (n = 100, 50 mg, po bid) in a single blind randomized parallel design. Another 199 patients received carvedilol in open trial, 10-20 mg, po, bid for 4 wk and among them 49 patients who succeed to response to carvedilol treatment continued up to 6 mo, the doses of Carvedilol and labetalol were (remained as before or increased) from 10-20 mg and 50-100 mg, po, bid, respectively after 2 wk treatment according to the blood pressure. RESULTS: The blood pressure and heart rate of 200 Patients in a single blind randomized parallel-design were significanty decreasing since 1 wk after receiving hath carvedilol and labetalol and the response rateS (defined as a decrease in sitting DBP to

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of carvedilol and labetalol in treating essential hypertension. METHODS: Three hundred and ninety-nine patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension (M 228, F 171, age; 53 a +- s 9 a) were studied. Two hundred Patients received Carvedilol (n = 100, 10 mg, po, bid) and labetalol (n = 100, 50 mg, po bid) in a single blind randomized parallel design. Another 199 patients received carvedilol in open trial, 10-20 mg, po, bid for 4 wk and among them 49 patients who succeed to response to carvedilol treatment continued up to 6 mo, the doses of Carvedilol and labetalol were (remained as before or increased) from 10-20 mg and 50-100 mg, po, bid, respectively after 2 wk treatment according to the blood pressure. RESULTS: The blood pressure and heart rate of 200 Patients in a single blind randomized parallel-design were significanty decreasing since 1 wk after receiving hath carvedilol and labetalol and the response rateS (defined as a decrease in sitting DBP to

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of carvedilol and labetalol in treating essential hypertension. METHODS: Three hundred and ninety-nine patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension (M 228, F 171, age; 53 a +- s 9 a) were studied. Two hundred Patients received Carvedilol (n = 100, 10 mg, po, bid) and labetalol (n = 100, 50 mg, po bid) in a single blind randomized parallel design. Another 199 patients received carvedilol in open trial, 10-20 mg, po, bid for 4 wk and among them 49 patients who succeed to response to carvedilol treatment continued up to 6 mo, the doses of Carvedilol and labetalol were (remained as before or increased) from 10-20 mg and 50-100 mg, po, bid, respectively after 2 wk treatment according to the blood pressure. RESULTS: The blood pressure and heart rate of 200 Patients in a single blind randomized parallel-design were significanty decreasing since 1 wk after receiving hath carvedilol and labetalol and the response rateS (defined as a decrease in sitting DBP to

Key concepts: Carvedilol, Labetalol, Blood pressure, Medicine, Essential hypertension, Heart rate, Anesthesia, Randomized controlled trial

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Carvedilol vs labetalol in treating mild to moderate essential hypertension in 399 patients — Research Paper | ScholarLens