Issue of Objectivity: Galtamer's Strategy and Dilemma
Hua Zhang-lin
Abstract
Hua Zhang-lin
Abstract
Philosophic exegetics invited attacks from relativism because of its ontological interpretation of the meaning of text. In order to avoid relativism, Galmater took a strategy of augumentation stressing the logical function of categorial duality, which drew concern from many a philosopher. The argument shows it is a worthwhile issue to determine the vision of a discussion concerning objectivity. For objectivity is in essence not an issue concerning the existentiality of things but one concerning spiritual activity and the meaning of its results.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Philosophic exegetics invited attacks from relativism because of its ontological interpretation of the meaning of text. In order to avoid relativism, Galmater took a strategy of augumentation stressing the logical function of categorial duality, which drew concern from many a philosopher. The argument shows it is a worthwhile issue to determine the vision of a discussion concerning objectivity. For objectivity is in essence not an issue concerning the existentiality of things but one concerning spiritual activity and the meaning of its results.
Key concepts: Objectivity (philosophy), Relativism, Epistemology, Dilemma, Philosophy, Meaning (existential), Argument (complex analysis), Biochemistry