On the Relevance of Standpoint Epistemology to the Practice of Journalism: The Case for "Strong Objectivity"
Meenakshi Gigi Durham
Abstract
Meenakshi Gigi Durham
Abstract
This paper interrogates traditional notions of journalistic “objectivity” and its interpretation in conventional news reporting. I argue here that the underlying principles of objectivity devolve in practice to an epistemic relativism that fails to consider the validity of various truth claims. I propose an alternative of “strong objectivity” grounded in standpoint theory. I trace the arguments against scientific objectivity that parallel critiques of journalistic objectivity, then propose an alternative conception of praxis that maximizes reflexivity and has the potential to fulfill the liberatory goals of journalism.
OpenAlex reports 183 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper interrogates traditional notions of journalistic “objectivity” and its interpretation in conventional news reporting. I argue here that the underlying principles of objectivity devolve in practice to an epistemic relativism that fails to consider the validity of various truth claims. I propose an alternative of “strong objectivity” grounded in standpoint theory. I trace the arguments against scientific objectivity that parallel critiques of journalistic objectivity, then propose an alternative conception of praxis that maximizes reflexivity and has the potential to fulfill the liberatory goals of journalism.
Key concepts: Objectivity (philosophy), Journalism, Sociology, Feminist epistemology, Relevance (law), Epistemology, Media studies, Gender studies