1998Communication TheoryRequires access

On the Relevance of Standpoint Epistemology to the Practice of Journalism: The Case for "Strong Objectivity"

Meenakshi Gigi Durham

Open publisher page 183 citations

Abstract

This paper interrogates traditional notions of journalistic “objectivity” and its interpretation in conventional news reporting. I argue here that the underlying principles of objectivity devolve in practice to an epistemic relativism that fails to consider the validity of various truth claims. I propose an alternative of “strong objectivity” grounded in standpoint theory. I trace the arguments against scientific objectivity that parallel critiques of journalistic objectivity, then propose an alternative conception of praxis that maximizes reflexivity and has the potential to fulfill the liberatory goals of journalism.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper interrogates traditional notions of journalistic “objectivity” and its interpretation in conventional news reporting. I argue here that the underlying principles of objectivity devolve in practice to an epistemic relativism that fails to consider the validity of various truth claims. I propose an alternative of “strong objectivity” grounded in standpoint theory. I trace the arguments against scientific objectivity that parallel critiques of journalistic objectivity, then propose an alternative conception of praxis that maximizes reflexivity and has the potential to fulfill the liberatory goals of journalism.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 183 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper interrogates traditional notions of journalistic “objectivity” and its interpretation in conventional news reporting. I argue here that the underlying principles of objectivity devolve in practice to an epistemic relativism that fails to consider the validity of various truth claims. I propose an alternative of “strong objectivity” grounded in standpoint theory. I trace the arguments against scientific objectivity that parallel critiques of journalistic objectivity, then propose an alternative conception of praxis that maximizes reflexivity and has the potential to fulfill the liberatory goals of journalism.

Key concepts: Objectivity (philosophy), Journalism, Sociology, Feminist epistemology, Relevance (law), Epistemology, Media studies, Gender studies

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On the Relevance of Standpoint Epistemology to the Practice of Journalism: The Case for "Strong Objectivity" — Research Paper | ScholarLens