1991Coastal Zone '91Requires access

Fishery Management Implications of the U.S. Territorial Sea Extension

Jeffery A. Ballweber, Richard G. Hildreth

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act of 1976 (MFCMA) declares a national standard that '[t]o the extent practicable, an individual stock of fish shall be managed as a unit throughout its range, and interrelated stocks of fish shall be managed as a unit or in close coordination.' MFCMA subsection 301(a) (3). Stocks of fish may range through several ocean jurisdictional boundaries. For instance jurisdictional boundaries exist at state internal waters, state ocean waters, the territorial sea and the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). A states' internal waters are inside the baseline delineating the territorial sea. MFCMA subsection 306(c) (4) (B). Currently, a states' ocean waters correspond to the old three nautical mile territorial sea. For fisheries management purposes, the U.S. EEZ extends 197 nautical miles from the seaward boundary of each coastal state at three nautical miles. MFCMA subsection 3(6). Otherwise the U.S. EEZ extends 188 nautical miles from the seaward edge of the twelve nautical mile U.S. territorial sea. The Presidential proclamation extending the territorial sea from three to twelve nautical miles creates a new zone nine nautical miles wide extending three to twelve nautical miles from the territorial sea's baseline. This creates an opportunity for a new era of federal/state and interstate coordination in managing the marine fishery resources. Despite the proclamation's claim to maintain the status quo regarding domestic laws, the proclamation could have significant domestic legal implications.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act of 1976 (MFCMA) declares a national standard that '[t]o the extent practicable, an individual stock of fish shall be managed as a unit throughout its range, and interrelated stocks of fish shall be managed as a unit or in close coordination.' MFCMA subsection 301(a) (3). Stocks of fish may range through several ocean jurisdictional boundaries. For instance jurisdictional boundaries exist at state internal waters, state ocean waters, the territorial sea and the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). A states' internal waters are inside the baseline delineating the territorial sea. MFCMA subsection 306(c) (4) (B). Currently, a states' ocean waters correspond to the old three nautical mile territorial sea. For fisheries management purposes, the U.S. EEZ extends 197 nautical miles from the seaward boundary of each coastal state at three nautical miles. MFCMA subsection 3(6). Otherwise the U.S. EEZ extends 188 nautical miles from the seaward edge of the twelve nautical mile U.S. territorial sea. The Presidential proclamation extending the territorial sea from three to twelve nautical miles creates a new zone nine nautical miles wide extending three to twelve nautical miles from the territorial sea's baseline. This creates an opportunity for a new era of federal/state and interstate coordination in managing the marine fishery resources. Despite the proclamation's claim to maintain the status quo regarding domestic laws, the proclamation could have significant domestic legal implications.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act of 1976 (MFCMA) declares a national standard that '[t]o the extent practicable, an individual stock of fish shall be managed as a unit throughout its range, and interrelated stocks of fish shall be managed as a unit or in close coordination.' MFCMA subsection 301(a) (3). Stocks of fish may range through several ocean jurisdictional boundaries. For instance jurisdictional boundaries exist at state internal waters, state ocean waters, the territorial sea and the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). A states' internal waters are inside the baseline delineating the territorial sea. MFCMA subsection 306(c) (4) (B). Currently, a states' ocean waters correspond to the old three nautical mile territorial sea. For fisheries management purposes, the U.S. EEZ extends 197 nautical miles from the seaward boundary of each coastal state at three nautical miles. MFCMA subsection 3(6). Otherwise the U.S. EEZ extends 188 nautical miles from the seaward edge of the twelve nautical mile U.S. territorial sea. The Presidential proclamation extending the territorial sea from three to twelve nautical miles creates a new zone nine nautical miles wide extending three to twelve nautical miles from the territorial sea's baseline. This creates an opportunity for a new era of federal/state and interstate coordination in managing the marine fishery resources. Despite the proclamation's claim to maintain the status quo regarding domestic laws, the proclamation could have significant domestic legal implications.

Key concepts: Exclusive economic zone, Nautical mile, Territorial waters, Proclamation, Fishery, United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Geography, Fisheries management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fishery Management Implications of the U.S. Territorial Sea Extension — Research Paper | ScholarLens