2016Annals of Plant Protection SciencesRequires access

Field efficacy of insecticides against Brown plant hopper

S. B. Kharbade, A.J. Chormule, V.M. Karade

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The present investigation was conducted to evaluate triazophos 40 EC, clothianidin 50 WDG, buprofezin 25 SC, lambda-cyhalothrin 5 EC, thiamethoxam 25 WG, imidacloprid 17.8 SL, acetamiprid 20 SP and Metarhizium anisopliae WP against brown plant hopper The infestation was effectively checked due to spray of clothianidin 50 WDG and proved to be most effective treatment (1.40)/hill. The next better treatments in order of effectiveness were buprofezin 20 SC, acetamiprid 20 SP, thiamethoxam 25 WG and imidacloprid 17.8 SL, lambda cyhalotrin 5 EC, triazophos 17.8 SL. The biopesticide M. anisopliae was observed to be comparatively least effective though relatively safe to natural enemies. This was followed by buprofezin, imidacloprid, acetamiprid, thiamethoxam, clothianidin’ triazophos and lambda cyhalothrin which were proved moderately safe to natural enemies in rice ecosystem.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The present investigation was conducted to evaluate triazophos 40 EC, clothianidin 50 WDG, buprofezin 25 SC, lambda-cyhalothrin 5 EC, thiamethoxam 25 WG, imidacloprid 17.8 SL, acetamiprid 20 SP and Metarhizium anisopliae WP against brown plant hopper The infestation was effectively checked due to spray of clothianidin 50 WDG and proved to be most effective treatment (1.40)/hill. The next better treatments in order of effectiveness were buprofezin 20 SC, acetamiprid 20 SP, thiamethoxam 25 WG and imidacloprid 17.8 SL, lambda cyhalotrin 5 EC, triazophos 17.8 SL. The biopesticide M. anisopliae was observed to be comparatively least effective though relatively safe to natural enemies. This was followed by buprofezin, imidacloprid, acetamiprid, thiamethoxam, clothianidin’ triazophos and lambda cyhalothrin which were proved moderately safe to natural enemies in rice ecosystem.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The present investigation was conducted to evaluate triazophos 40 EC, clothianidin 50 WDG, buprofezin 25 SC, lambda-cyhalothrin 5 EC, thiamethoxam 25 WG, imidacloprid 17.8 SL, acetamiprid 20 SP and Metarhizium anisopliae WP against brown plant hopper The infestation was effectively checked due to spray of clothianidin 50 WDG and proved to be most effective treatment (1.40)/hill. The next better treatments in order of effectiveness were buprofezin 20 SC, acetamiprid 20 SP, thiamethoxam 25 WG and imidacloprid 17.8 SL, lambda cyhalotrin 5 EC, triazophos 17.8 SL. The biopesticide M. anisopliae was observed to be comparatively least effective though relatively safe to natural enemies. This was followed by buprofezin, imidacloprid, acetamiprid, thiamethoxam, clothianidin’ triazophos and lambda cyhalothrin which were proved moderately safe to natural enemies in rice ecosystem.

Key concepts: Thiamethoxam, Clothianidin, Imidacloprid, Acetamiprid, Toxicology, Thiacloprid, Cyhalothrin, Neonicotinoid

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Field efficacy of insecticides against Brown plant hopper — Research Paper | ScholarLens