2002Journal of the Korean Radiological SocietyRequires access

Diagnostic Accuracy of Mammography and Ultrasonography in Detection of Early Breast Cancer

Sang‐Min Lee, Hye Young Choi, Seung Yon Baek, Jeong Soo Suh, Chung Sik Rhee, Byung-In Moon

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the value of mammography and ultrasonography in the detection of early breast cancer, and the usefulness of combining the two modalities for the diagnostic study of this condition. Materials and Methods: The mammographic and ultrasonographic features of 47 female patients aged 23-68 (average, 46) years with pathologically proven early breast cancer were analyzed retrospectively. Mammography was performed in 46 patients and ultrasonography in 38, and 37 underwent both mammography and ultrasonography. Analysis of the mammographic and/or ultrasonographic features focused on mass, microcalcification, mass with microcalcification, multiple nodules, duct dilatation, and architectural distortion. Results: Mammography revealed microcalcification in 29 (63%) patients, mass in 13 (28%) patients, mass with microcalcification in 8 (17%) patients, multiple nodules in 2 (4%) patients, architectural distortions in 1 (2%) patient, and negative finding in 9 (20%) patients. Ultrasonography revealed mass in 25 (66%) patients, microcalcifcation in 9 (24%) patients, mass with microcalcification in 8 (21%) patients, multiple nodules in 2 (5%) patients, duct dilatation in 3 (8%) patients, and negative finding in 7 (18%) patients. On combined study of mammography and ultrasonography of the 37 patients, mammography or ultrasonography revealed mass in 25 (68%) patients, microcalcification in 20 (54%) patients, multiple nodules in 2 (5%) patients, duct dilatation in 3 (8%) patients, and architectural distortion in 1 (3%) patient. In one (3%) patient among them, both mammography and ultrasonography revealed negative findings. The false negative rate of mammography, ultrasonography or both was 20%, 18%, and 3%, respectively, which was statistically significant difference (p

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose: To determine the value of mammography and ultrasonography in the detection of early breast cancer, and the usefulness of combining the two modalities for the diagnostic study of this condition. Materials and Methods: The mammographic and ultrasonographic features of 47 female patients aged 23-68 (average, 46) years with pathologically proven early breast cancer were analyzed retrospectively. Mammography was performed in 46 patients and ultrasonography in 38, and 37 underwent both mammography and ultrasonography. Analysis of the mammographic and/or ultrasonographic features focused on mass, microcalcification, mass with microcalcification, multiple nodules, duct dilatation, and architectural distortion. Results: Mammography revealed microcalcification in 29 (63%) patients, mass in 13 (28%) patients, mass with microcalcification in 8 (17%) patients, multiple nodules in 2 (4%) patients, architectural distortions in 1 (2%) patient, and negative finding in 9 (20%) patients. Ultrasonography revealed mass in 25 (66%) patients, microcalcifcation in 9 (24%) patients, mass with microcalcification in 8 (21%) patients, multiple nodules in 2 (5%) patients, duct dilatation in 3 (8%) patients, and negative finding in 7 (18%) patients. On combined study of mammography and ultrasonography of the 37 patients, mammography or ultrasonography revealed mass in 25 (68%) patients, microcalcification in 20 (54%) patients, multiple nodules in 2 (5%) patients, duct dilatation in 3 (8%) patients, and architectural distortion in 1 (3%) patient. In one (3%) patient among them, both mammography and ultrasonography revealed negative findings. The false negative rate of mammography, ultrasonography or both was 20%, 18%, and 3%, respectively, which was statistically significant difference (p

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose: To determine the value of mammography and ultrasonography in the detection of early breast cancer, and the usefulness of combining the two modalities for the diagnostic study of this condition. Materials and Methods: The mammographic and ultrasonographic features of 47 female patients aged 23-68 (average, 46) years with pathologically proven early breast cancer were analyzed retrospectively. Mammography was performed in 46 patients and ultrasonography in 38, and 37 underwent both mammography and ultrasonography. Analysis of the mammographic and/or ultrasonographic features focused on mass, microcalcification, mass with microcalcification, multiple nodules, duct dilatation, and architectural distortion. Results: Mammography revealed microcalcification in 29 (63%) patients, mass in 13 (28%) patients, mass with microcalcification in 8 (17%) patients, multiple nodules in 2 (4%) patients, architectural distortions in 1 (2%) patient, and negative finding in 9 (20%) patients. Ultrasonography revealed mass in 25 (66%) patients, microcalcifcation in 9 (24%) patients, mass with microcalcification in 8 (21%) patients, multiple nodules in 2 (5%) patients, duct dilatation in 3 (8%) patients, and negative finding in 7 (18%) patients. On combined study of mammography and ultrasonography of the 37 patients, mammography or ultrasonography revealed mass in 25 (68%) patients, microcalcification in 20 (54%) patients, multiple nodules in 2 (5%) patients, duct dilatation in 3 (8%) patients, and architectural distortion in 1 (3%) patient. In one (3%) patient among them, both mammography and ultrasonography revealed negative findings. The false negative rate of mammography, ultrasonography or both was 20%, 18%, and 3%, respectively, which was statistically significant difference (p

Key concepts: Mammography, Microcalcification, Medicine, Radiology, Ultrasonography, Breast cancer, Cancer, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Diagnostic Accuracy of Mammography and Ultrasonography in Detection of Early Breast Cancer — Research Paper | ScholarLens