2008•The Korean Journal of Internal MedicineOpen access

Sulfate free polyethylene glycol versus standard polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy preparation: a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded comparison

Jung Ho Kim, Jeong Sik Byeon, Sang Hyun Park, Jin Kyung Ryu, Byunggyu Kim, Jun Won Chung, Kwi Sook Choi, Byong Duk Ye, Seung‐Jae Myung, Suk-Kyun Yang, Jin Ho Kim

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

Background/Aims : Although polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution is safe and effective for bowel preparation for colonoscopy, its salty taste as well as the required large volume limits its use. Sulfate free PEG (SF-PEG) solution was developed to reduce the salty taste by removing the sodium sulfate. The aim of this study was to compare the SF-PEG solution with the standard PEG solution in regard to the quality of bowel preparation, the degree of patients’ satisfaction and the side effects in Korean patients. Methods : From July through September in 2006, 100 patients who underwent colonoscopic polypectomy were prospectively enrolled. They were randomly assigned to receive either PEG or SF-PEG solution. The quality of bowel preparation was assessed by one colonoscopist who was blinded with regard to the type of preparation used. Detailed questionnaires were used to assess the patients’ tolerance and satisfaction. The serum biochemical parameters were measured before and after bowel cleansing. Results : The numbers of patients whose quality of bowel preparation was excellent, good, fair and poor were 2, 43, 5 and 0 in PEG group, while this was 0, 41, 9 and 0 in SF-PEG group, respectively (p=0.118). The side effects were not different between the groups. The visual analog scale score of the patients’ satisfaction was 6.4±2.4 in the PEG group and 5.8±2.8 in the SF-PEG group (p=0.237). The changes of serum biochemical parameters were also not different. Conclusions : The SF-PEG solution shows similar effectiveness and safety for bowel preparation for colonoscopy when compared to the standard PEG solution. The SF-PEG solution is a good solution to use for colonoscopy preparation. (Korean J Med 74:30-36, 2008)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background/Aims : Although polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution is safe and effective for bowel preparation for colonoscopy, its salty taste as well as the required large volume limits its use. Sulfate free PEG (SF-PEG) solution was developed to reduce the salty taste by removing the sodium sulfate. The aim of this study was to compare the SF-PEG solution with the standard PEG solution in regard to the quality of bowel preparation, the degree of patients’ satisfaction and the side effects in Korean patients. Methods : From July through September in 2006, 100 patients who underwent colonoscopic polypectomy were prospectively enrolled. They were randomly assigned to receive either PEG or SF-PEG solution. The quality of bowel preparation was assessed by one colonoscopist who was blinded with regard to the type of preparation used. Detailed questionnaires were used to assess the patients’ tolerance and satisfaction. The serum biochemical parameters were measured before and after bowel cleansing. Results : The numbers of patients whose quality of bowel preparation was excellent, good, fair and poor were 2, 43, 5 and 0 in PEG group, while this was 0, 41, 9 and 0 in SF-PEG group, respectively (p=0.118). The side effects were not different between the groups. The visual analog scale score of the patients’ satisfaction was 6.4±2.4 in the PEG group and 5.8±2.8 in the SF-PEG group (p=0.237). The changes of serum biochemical parameters were also not different. Conclusions : The SF-PEG solution shows similar effectiveness and safety for bowel preparation for colonoscopy when compared to the standard PEG solution. The SF-PEG solution is a good solution to use for colonoscopy preparation. (Korean J Med 74:30-36, 2008)

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background/Aims : Although polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution is safe and effective for bowel preparation for colonoscopy, its salty taste as well as the required large volume limits its use. Sulfate free PEG (SF-PEG) solution was developed to reduce the salty taste by removing the sodium sulfate. The aim of this study was to compare the SF-PEG solution with the standard PEG solution in regard to the quality of bowel preparation, the degree of patients’ satisfaction and the side effects in Korean patients. Methods : From July through September in 2006, 100 patients who underwent colonoscopic polypectomy were prospectively enrolled. They were randomly assigned to receive either PEG or SF-PEG solution. The quality of bowel preparation was assessed by one colonoscopist who was blinded with regard to the type of preparation used. Detailed questionnaires were used to assess the patients’ tolerance and satisfaction. The serum biochemical parameters were measured before and after bowel cleansing. Results : The numbers of patients whose quality of bowel preparation was excellent, good, fair and poor were 2, 43, 5 and 0 in PEG group, while this was 0, 41, 9 and 0 in SF-PEG group, respectively (p=0.118). The side effects were not different between the groups. The visual analog scale score of the patients’ satisfaction was 6.4±2.4 in the PEG group and 5.8±2.8 in the SF-PEG group (p=0.237). The changes of serum biochemical parameters were also not different. Conclusions : The SF-PEG solution shows similar effectiveness and safety for bowel preparation for colonoscopy when compared to the standard PEG solution. The SF-PEG solution is a good solution to use for colonoscopy preparation. (Korean J Med 74:30-36, 2008)

Key concepts: Medicine, PEG ratio, Colonoscopy, Polyethylene glycol, Bowel preparation, Gastroenterology, Internal medicine, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sulfate free polyethylene glycol versus standard polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy preparation: a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded comparison — Research Paper | ScholarLens