Lumbar Myelography with Iohexol and Metrizamide
T. Hindmarsh, Sven Ekholm, D K Kido, Lawrence G. Sahler, Mark S. Sands
Abstract
T. Hindmarsh, Sven Ekholm, D K Kido, Lawrence G. Sahler, Mark S. Sands
Abstract
Two non-ionic contrast media, iohexol and metrizamide, were compared in a double-blind clinical trial which included 50 patients who underwent lumbar myelography for disc herniation or spinal stenosis. The frequency of adverse reactions was lower for iohexol which is recommended for extended trials and for examination of other compartments of the subarachnoid space.
OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Two non-ionic contrast media, iohexol and metrizamide, were compared in a double-blind clinical trial which included 50 patients who underwent lumbar myelography for disc herniation or spinal stenosis. The frequency of adverse reactions was lower for iohexol which is recommended for extended trials and for examination of other compartments of the subarachnoid space.
Key concepts: Metrizamide, Iohexol, Myelography, Medicine, Subarachnoid space, Lumbar, Lumbar spinal stenosis, Radiology